Benelli Imperiale 400 BS6 vs Husqvarna Vitpilen 401

Compare Specifications of Imperiale 400 BS6 and Vitpilen 401

Selected Bikes

Benelli Imperiale 400 BS6
Benelli Imperiale 400 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna Vitpilen 401
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 374.00 cc 373.20 cc
Engine Single-cylinder, Air-cooled, 4-valves/cylinder, SOHC 4-Stroke Liquid Cooled Engine
Engine Starting ELECTRIC Electric Starter
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication with wet sump --
Clutch Multidisc wet clutch --
Fuel System Fuel-Injection --
Ignition ECU – DELPHI MT05 --
Cooling System Air-cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 21 PS @ 6000 rpm --
Maximum Torque 29 Nm @ 3500 rpm --
Transmission 5-speed 6-Speed Manual
Top Speed 120 kmph --
Frame Double cradle with steel tubes and plates --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 30 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/90 - 19 17-inch
Rear 130/80 - 18 17-inch
Wheel / RIM Spoked rim Spoke
Brakes
Front 300 mm single disc (ABS) 320mm Disc
Rear 240 mm single disc (ABS) 230mm Disc
Suspension
Front 41 mm Telescopic 43mm, USD forks
Rear Pre-load adjustable Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors Red
Black
Silver
--


Physical Specs
Length 2170 mm --
Width 820 mm --
Height 1120 mm --
Weight 205 kg --
Seat Height 780 --
Wheelbase 1440 mm --
Ground Clearance 165 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres --
Overview
About The Benelli Imperiale 400 BS6 is a certified motorcycle with an impressive engine displacement Read More --
Features Asymmetrically Shaped and Thin-film-transistor LCD Display
Retro Round Front Headlight

Benelli Imperiale 400 Bs6
Exhaust

Benelli Imperiale 400 Bs6
Tail Lamp & Indicators

Benelli Imperiale 400 Bs6
LCD Display
--
Additional Details EXHAUST SYSTEM : With catalytic converter and oxygen sensors
FINAL DRIVE : Chain
SPARK PLUG : NGK BR7ES
FUEL CONSUMPTION : 3.2 l/100 km
CO2 emissions: 70 g/km
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Strong and robust build quality.
- Retro styling combined with modern features.
- Air-cooled engine that offers good performance.
- Reliable braking system with ABS.
- Comfortable seating and suspension setup for long rides.
--
Cons - On the heavier side with a weight of 205 kg, affecting maneuverability in traffic.
- Limited tank capacity of 12 litres may require more frequent refueling on long trips.
- Slightly higher CO2 emissions at 70 g/km.
- No liquid-cooling system, which may be a factor in extreme weather conditions.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5260