Benelli 302S vs Yezdi Adventure Camo

Compare Specifications of Benelli 302S and Adventure Camo

Selected Bikes

Benelli 302S
Benelli 302S

Brand:

Model:

Yezdi Adventure Camo
Yezdi Adventure Camo

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 302.00 cc 334.00 cc
Engine Two cylinder 4-stroke 4-valve Benelli engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, DOHC
Engine Starting -- Electric
Fuel System -- Electronic Fuel Injection
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 38 hp @ 11000 rpm 30.20 PS
Maximum Torque 25.6 Nm @ 9750 rpm 29.90 NM
Transmission 6 speed Constant Mesh, 6 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display -- LCD Display
Frame Steel trestle frame Double Cradle
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 90/90 – 21"
Rear -- 130/80 – 17"
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Twin 260 mm floating discs with a 4 piston caliper brake 320 MM Disc With Floating Caliper And ABS
Rear Single 240 mm disc with a single piston caliper brake 240 MM Disc With Floating Caliper And ABS
Suspension
Front 41 mm USD forks Telescopic Fork & Coil Spring
Rear shock absorber with adjustable preload. Mono Shock Absorbers With Coil Spring & Linkage Mechanism
Colors Available
Colors White, Black Ranger Camo


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 188 kg
Seat Height -- 815
Wheelbase -- 1465 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 15.5 litres
Overview
About -- The Yezdi Adventure Camo is a powerful motorcycle that boasts a 334cc single-cylinder, 4 Read More
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Exhaust : Single side exhaust
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Retro-inspired design with a rugged and adventurous appeal.
- Potent 334cc engine with efficient fuel injection for a thrilling riding experience.
- Reliable braking system with ABS for enhanced safety on various terrains.
- Comfortable ergonomics and well-balanced riding position.
- LCD display for easy-to-read essential information during rides.
Cons -- - Limited color option with only the "Ranger Camo" available.
- Some riders may prefer more modern features and technology.
- Lack of storage options for longer touring expeditions.
- Restricted to on-road and light off-road adventures due to spoke wheels.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4928