Bajaj Pulsar RS 200 ABS vs TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0

Compare Specifications of Pulsar RS 200 ABS and Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar RS 200 ABS
Bajaj Pulsar RS 200 ABS

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0
TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.50 cc 197.75 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC 4 Valve, Liquid cooled, Triple Spark ,Fi SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled
Engine Starting Electric Start Electric Start
Clutch -- A-RT (Anti Reverse Torque) Slipper Clutch
Fuel System Fuel Injection Bosch-Closed Loop
Ignition Digital CDI Mapped Ignition System
Cooling System Liquid cooled Oil Cooler with Ram Air Assist
Maximum Power 24.5 Bhp @ 9750 rpm 21.0 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm 18.1 ± 0.5 Nm @ 7000 ± 300 r
Transmission 6-Speed 5 Speed Gear Box
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 140 kmph 129 kmph
Battery 12 V Full DC MF 12V, 9Ah
Frame Pressed Steel Perimeter Beam Section Frame Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Headlamp -- 60/55W, H4 Bulb with All-Day On LED Position Lamp
Taillamp LED LED 2.5 W
Mileage
Overall Mileage 35 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 90/90-17
Rear 130/70-17 130/70-17
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Single channel ABS, 300 dia disc Disc (270 mm Petal type)
Rear 230 dia disc Disc (240 mm Petal type)
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush Telescopic Forks
Rear Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister Mono Tube - Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors -- Black, Grey, Red, White and Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length 1999 mm 2050 mm
Width 765 mm 790 mm
Height 1114 mm 1050 mm
Weight 164 kg 149 kg
Wheelbase 1355 mm 1353 mm
Ground Clearance 157 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- The TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0 is a popular choice among motorcycle enthusiasts, Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful and efficient engine.
- Great handling and comfort.
- Good fuel efficiency.
- Attractive design and colour options.
Cons -- - Limited fuel tank capacity (12 litres).
- Slightly heavier (149 kg) compared to competitors.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3945