Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6 vs UM DSR 200

Compare Specifications of Pulsar NS 200 BS6 and DSR 200

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Brand:

Model:

UM DSR 200
UM DSR 200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.50 cc 196.00 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSVI Compliant FI DTS-i Engine 1 Cylinder, 4 Stroke
Engine Starting -- Electric / Kick
Clutch -- 5 Speed With Clutch
Fuel System Fuel injection --
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Air
Maximum Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm --
Maximum Torque 18.5 Nm @ 8000 rpm --
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Headlamp H4 Blue Tinge (12V 55/60W), With AHO (Auto Headlamps On) --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 52 P Tubeless --
Rear 130/70-17 62 P Tubeless --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front Single Channel ABS, 300 mm Disc (ABS)
280 mm Disc (Double Disc)
Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush Hydraulic Telescopic
Rear Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister Monoshock System
Colors Available
Colors Wild Red
Fiery Yellow
Mirage White
Graphite Black
Red, Black, Blue, Yellow


Physical Specs
Length 2017 mm 2075 mm
Width 804 mm 780 mm
Height 1075 mm 1320 mm
Weight -- 122 kg
Kerb Weight 156 --
Wheelbase 1363 mm 1352 mm
Ground Clearance 168 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 14 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6 is an impressive bike that comes equipped with a 199.50 cc 4 Read More --
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Aggressive and muscular design catches the eye.
- Strong engine performance with decent fuel efficiency.
- Comfortable ride quality, even on rough terrains.
- Effective braking system with Single Channel ABS for enhanced safety.
- Tubeless tyres provide excellent grip and reduce the risk of sudden deflation.
- Liquid cooling system ensures the engine runs optimally even under strain.
--
Cons - The 12-litre fuel tank could be larger for long-distance travel.
- Lack of dual-channel ABS can affect handling under emergency braking.
- Seat comfort could be improved for better long-ride comfort.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3188