Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6 vs Bajaj Pulsar RS 200

Compare Specifications of Pulsar NS 200 BS6 and Pulsar RS 200

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar RS 200
Bajaj Pulsar RS 200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.50 cc 199.50 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSVI Compliant FI DTS-i Engine Triple Spark 4-Valve 200cc BSVI DTS-i FI Engine, Liquid Cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric Push Start and Kick Start
Clutch -- Wet Multiplate
Fuel System Fuel injection Fuel Injection System
Ignition -- Digital CDI
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 24.5 PS @ 9750 RPM
Maximum Torque 18.5 Nm @ 8000 rpm 18.7 Nm @ 8000 RPM
Transmission -- 6-Speed Manual
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery 12V Full DC MF DC, 12V, 8Ah VRLA
Frame -- Pressed Steel Perimeter Beam Section Frame
Headlamp H4 Blue Tinge (12V 55/60W), With AHO (Auto Headlamps On) 55W Low beam Projector, 65W High beam Projector
Taillamp -- LED Tail Lamp
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 52 P Tubeless 100/80-17 52 P Tubeless
Rear 130/70-17 62 P Tubeless 130/70-17 62 P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloys
Brakes
Front Single Channel ABS, 300 mm Disc (ABS)
280 mm Disc (Double Disc)
Dual Channel ABS, 300 mm dia disc
Rear 230 mm Disc 230 mm dia disc with ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush Telescopic with anti-friction bush
Rear Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Colors Available
Colors Wild Red
Fiery Yellow
Mirage White
Graphite Black
Burnt Red
Pewter Grey
White


Physical Specs
Length 2017 mm 1999 mm
Width 804 mm 765 mm
Height 1075 mm 1114 mm
Kerb Weight 156 166
Wheelbase 1363 mm 1345 mm
Ground Clearance 168 mm 157 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 13 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6 is an impressive bike that comes equipped with a 199.50 cc 4 Read More Rolling out from Bajaj's stable is the new Pulsar RS 200, offering stiff competition to its riv Read More
Features -- Aggressive Muscular Styling - Stylish Full Fairing with prime aerodynamic efficiency. Admiration Guaranteed.

Crystal LED tail lamps - Distinctive high intensity tail lamps: Dazzle the competition as you whizz past them.

Twin Projector Headlamps - HD focus Twin projectors: Tame the darkest roads with devil's eyes.

ABS - Uber-responsive front ABS: Ultra safe braking performance over any surface.

Nitrox Mono Suspension - Invincible balance with super comfort: Carve corners or race ahead, for hours at a stretch.

Perimeter Frame - High stiffness-Low Flex for sharpest handling : Conquer the trickiest hairpins with elan.

Triple Spark DTS-i 4V FI engine.- Most Advanced engine technology, Patented by Bajaj: 24.5 PS of raw power ready to be unleashed.

Fuel Injection (FI) system - Seamless power delivery and Feather-Touch start : Tractable power & optimum fuel efficiency.

Liquid Cooling - Optimum engine performance at high temperatures: Ride On, No matter what.

Race exhaust - Midship race spec exhaust with a Throaty note : Hitting the redline never sounded better.

Bajaj Pulsar Rs 200
Pros and Cons
Pros - Aggressive and muscular design catches the eye.
- Strong engine performance with decent fuel efficiency.
- Comfortable ride quality, even on rough terrains.
- Effective braking system with Single Channel ABS for enhanced safety.
- Tubeless tyres provide excellent grip and reduce the risk of sudden deflation.
- Liquid cooling system ensures the engine runs optimally even under strain.
- Advanced liquid cooling system
- Ultra-safe braking with ABS technology
- Telescopic suspension with anti-friction bush
- Dual Channel ABS technology.
Cons - The 12-litre fuel tank could be larger for long-distance travel.
- Lack of dual-channel ABS can affect handling under emergency braking.
- Seat comfort could be improved for better long-ride comfort.
-Noise and vibration from the body kit
-Single ABS channel
-Riding position does not suit the bike
-It weighs heavier and difficult to manage in city traffic

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1673