Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6 vs UM Renegade Duty 150

Compare Specifications of Pulsar NS 160 BS6 and Renegade Duty 150

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Brand:

Model:

UM Renegade Duty 150
UM Renegade Duty 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 160.30 cc 149.00 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, SOHC 4 Valve, Oil Cooled, Twin Spark BSVI DTS-i FI engine 1 Cylinder, 4 Stroke
Engine Starting -- Electric / Kick
Fuel System Fuel injection --
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Oil Cooled Air Cooling
Maximum Power 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm 12.92 hp @ 7630 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm 11.32 nm @ 6360 rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed with Clutch
Top Speed 120 kmph --
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Headlamp H4 (12V 55/60W) --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 40 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 tyre --
Rear 130/70-17 tyre --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 300 mm Disc Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Drum
ABS Dual Channel ABS Braking --
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush Hydraulic Telescopic
Rear Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister Hydraulic With Spring
Colors Available
Colors Pearl Metallic White (2023)
Ebony Black (2023)
Saffire Blue
Wild Red
Fossil Grey
Red, Black, Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2017 mm 1975 mm
Width 803.5 mm 730 mm
Height 1060 mm 1050 mm
Weight -- 110 kg
Kerb Weight 151 --
Wheelbase 1372 mm 1350 mm
Ground Clearance 177 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 10.22 litres
Overview
About The 2023 update of the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 is a great improvement on an already impressive moto Read More --
Features Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Fuel Tank

Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Upside Down Front Fork
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Robust and responsive 160.3 cc engine offers impressive power and torque.
- Upside-down front fork and Nitrox mono shock absorber ensure a smooth and comfortable ride.
- Dual-channel ABS system provides enhanced safety during braking.
- Offers impressive fuel efficiency with 40 km per litre.
- Variety of colour options cater to different aesthetic preferences.
--
Cons - Top speed of 120 kmph may not satisfy speed enthusiasts.
- Limited ground clearance might affect performance on rough terrains.
- A 12-litre fuel tank might require frequent refills on longer rides.
- The ex-showroom price may be slightly higher compared to competitors in the same segment.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

263