Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6 vs Suzuki Gixxer SP

Compare Specifications of Pulsar NS 160 BS6 and Gixxer SP

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SP
Suzuki Gixxer SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 160.30 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, SOHC 4 Valve, Oil Cooled, Twin Spark BSVI DTS-i FI engine 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting -- Electric, Kick
Fuel System Fuel injection Carburettor
Cooling System Oil Cooled --
Maximum Power 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm 14Nm@6000rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed 120 kmph --
Battery 12V Full DC MF Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Headlamp H4 (12V 55/60W) 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 40 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 tyre 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Rear 130/70-17 tyre 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 300 mm Disc Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Disc
ABS Dual Channel ABS Braking --
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush Telescopic
Rear Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister Telescopic
Colors Available
Colors Pearl Metallic White (2023)
Ebony Black (2023)
Saffire Blue
Wild Red
Fossil Grey
Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2017 mm 2050 mm
Width 803.5 mm 785 mm
Height 1060 mm 1030 mm
Weight -- 139 kg
Kerb Weight 151 --
Wheelbase 1372 mm 1030 mm
Ground Clearance 177 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The 2023 update of the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 is a great improvement on an already impressive moto Read More Check the latest & other variants
Suzuki Read More
Features Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Fuel Tank

Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Upside Down Front Fork
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Robust and responsive 160.3 cc engine offers impressive power and torque.
- Upside-down front fork and Nitrox mono shock absorber ensure a smooth and comfortable ride.
- Dual-channel ABS system provides enhanced safety during braking.
- Offers impressive fuel efficiency with 40 km per litre.
- Variety of colour options cater to different aesthetic preferences.
- Balanced performance with good power and torque output
- Stylish design and great build quality
- Excellent ride comfort and handling
- Reliable braking system
- Easy to maintain
Cons - Top speed of 120 kmph may not satisfy speed enthusiasts.
- Limited ground clearance might affect performance on rough terrains.
- A 12-litre fuel tank might require frequent refills on longer rides.
- The ex-showroom price may be slightly higher compared to competitors in the same segment.
- Not the most powerful bike in its segment
- Limited color options
- Fuel efficiency could be better

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2212