Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6 vs Keeway Ajax 150

Compare Specifications of Pulsar NS 160 BS6 and Ajax 150

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Keeway Ajax 150
Keeway Ajax 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 160.30 cc 149.40 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, SOHC 4 Valve, Oil Cooled, Twin Spark BSVI DTS-i FI engine 1-cylinder/4-stroke/2-valve
Engine Starting -- Electric & Kick
Engine Lubrication -- Pressure splash lubrication
Clutch -- Wet multi-plate
Fuel System Fuel injection Carburetor
Ignition -- C.D.I
Cooling System Oil Cooled Air-cooled
Maximum Power 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm 8.2kW/8500 r/min
Maximum Torque 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm 10.0N.m/7500 r/min
Top Speed 120 kmph 97 kmph
Battery 12V Full DC MF 12V 7Ah (12N7-3B)
Frame -- Arch bar truck
Headlamp H4 (12V 55/60W) --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 40 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 tyre 2.75-18
Rear 130/70-17 tyre 3.00-18
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 300 mm Disc Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Drum
ABS Dual Channel ABS Braking --
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush Telescopic forks
Rear Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister Telescopic coil spring oil damped
Colors Available
Colors Pearl Metallic White (2023)
Ebony Black (2023)
Saffire Blue
Wild Red
Fossil Grey
Red, White,Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2017 mm 1979 mm
Width 803.5 mm 745 mm
Height 1060 mm 1224 mm
Weight -- 99 kg
Kerb Weight 151 --
Wheelbase 1372 mm 1246 mm
Ground Clearance 177 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 11.3 litres
Overview
About The 2023 update of the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 is a great improvement on an already impressive moto Read More --
Features Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Fuel Tank

Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Upside Down Front Fork
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Robust and responsive 160.3 cc engine offers impressive power and torque.
- Upside-down front fork and Nitrox mono shock absorber ensure a smooth and comfortable ride.
- Dual-channel ABS system provides enhanced safety during braking.
- Offers impressive fuel efficiency with 40 km per litre.
- Variety of colour options cater to different aesthetic preferences.
--
Cons - Top speed of 120 kmph may not satisfy speed enthusiasts.
- Limited ground clearance might affect performance on rough terrains.
- A 12-litre fuel tank might require frequent refills on longer rides.
- The ex-showroom price may be slightly higher compared to competitors in the same segment.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

755