Bajaj Pulsar F250 Dual Channel ABS vs Suzuki V-Strom SX

Compare Specifications of Pulsar F250 Dual Channel ABS and V-Strom SX

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar F250 Dual Channel ABS
Bajaj Pulsar F250 Dual Channel ABS

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki V-Strom SX
Suzuki V-Strom SX

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.07 cc 249.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Oil cooled, FI 4-stroke, Single-cylinder, oil-cooled, SOHC
Valve System : 4 valve
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- Electronic ignition
Cooling System Oil cooled Oil-cooled
Maximum Power 24.5 PS @ 8750 RPM 26.5 PS @ 9300 RPM
Maximum Torque 21.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm 22.2 NM @ 7300 RPM
Transmission Constant mesh 5 speed 6-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3--4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 145 kmph 140 kmph
Battery -- Maintenance Free, 12V 6AH
Headlamp Bi functional LED projector headlamp with LED DRLs LED
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 35 kmpl 30-35 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 100/90-19M/C 57S, tubeless
Rear -- 140/70-17M/C 66S, tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy 19-inch (48.26cm) front wheel
17-inch (43.18cm) rear wheel
Brakes
Front 300 mm Disc, Dual Channel ABS Disc, single
Rear 230 mm Disc Disc
ABS -- Dual-channel Antilock Brake System
Suspension
Front Telescopic (37 mm) Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear Monoshock with Nitrox Swing arm type, coil spring, oil damped
Colors Available
Colors Brooklyn Black --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2180 mm
Width -- 880 mm
Height -- 1355 mm
Kerb Weight 164 167
Seat Height -- 835
Wheelbase -- 1440 mm
Ground Clearance -- 205 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar F250 Dual Channel ABS is a powerful and stylish bike that is perfect for those Read More The Suzuki V-Strom SX is a popular adventure motorcycle that offers a compelling package of fea Read More
Features - The biggest Pulsar ever with a 249.07 cc engine
- Assist & Slipper clutch
- LED Projector headlamp
- Dual Channel ABS Braking Technology
- Ultra-safe braking performance
- Stronger grip
- All-black theme comes with gloss/ matte high sparkle paints with slivers of silvers and reds
- Crystalline LED tail lamps
- New mono-shock suspension
- New infinity display
- USB mobile charging port
- Smart fuel reading

Console features
- Gear indicator
- Clock
- Fuel efficiency
- Range indicator
- Beak Design
- LED Headlights
- LED Tail Lamp
- Knuckle covers
- Windscreen
- Separate seat
- Suzuki Easy Start System
- USB outlet
- Suzuki Ride Connect Application
- Dual-exit muffler
- Engine under cowling
- Graphics
- Suzuki Oil Cooling System (SOCS)
- Suzuki Eco Performance (SEP)
- Dual-channel Antilock Brake System
- Rear carrier / Grab bar
- Footrest rubber
Accessories -- - Fuel Tank Pad
- Wheel Decal
- Fuel tank protection
Pros and Cons
Pros - Strong and efficient 249.07 cc engine offers robust power and performance.
- The Dual Channel ABS and disc brake setup ensures superior braking safety.
- Modern and comprehensive console with features like gear indicator, range indicator, and clock.
- Attractive and muscular design with all-black theme and LED lighting.
- Comfortable ride quality owing to the effective suspension system and well-balanced weight.
- Striking design with beak design and LED lighting
- Comfortable separate seat and footrest rubber for enhanced riding experience
- Innovative features like Suzuki Easy Start System and Ride Connect Application
- Powerful engine performance and impressive fuel efficiency
- Rugged durability with engine under cowling and knuckle covers
Cons - Mileage of 35 km per litre might be a tad lower for some fuel-economy oriented riders.
- Some riders may prefer a 6-speed transmission for better highway cruising.
0 Limited color options with only Brooklyn Black available.
- Absence of connectivity features like Bluetooth which are becoming increasingly common in this segment.
- Limited fuel tank capacity (12 litres)
- Relatively high seat height (835 mm) may not be suitable for shorter riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1923