Bajaj Pulsar 400 CS vs KTM RC 390 GP

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 400 CS and RC 390 GP

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 400 CS
Bajaj Pulsar 400 CS

Brand:

Model:

KTM RC 390 GP
KTM RC 390 GP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 375.00 cc 373.27 cc
Engine 4 valve, triple spark with fuel injection Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced, Wet sump
Fuel System -- Bosch Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI)
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid cooling. Curved radiator with fans for better heat management
Maximum Power -- 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 37 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Transmission 6 speed --
Battery -- 12 V, 8 AH MF battery
Display -- TFT Multifunction display
Frame -- Split-Trellis frame (Tubular)
Sub Frame Newly engineered bolt-on subframe
Headlamp -- LED Headlamp
Tyres
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front -- --
Rear -- 230 mm Disc with Floating calliper
Suspension
Front -- WP APEX USD forks, 43 mm diameter
Rear -- WP APEX Monoshock, 10 step adjustable
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Kerb Weight -- 172
Seat Height -- 835
Ground Clearance -- 153 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 13.7 litres
Overview
About CS stands for Cruiser Sport Read More The KTM RC 390 GP is a high-performance sports bike that is designed to offer an exhilarating r Read More
Features ABS Equipped Brakes - Ready to Race Motorcycle
- WP Apex Suspension
- PANKL Racing System
Additional Details -- Rider Aids: MTC, Quickshifter+, Cornering ABS, SUPERMOTO
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - High performance engine providing impressive power and torque
- Excellent handling and ride quality with adjustable WP Apex suspension
- Robust suite of rider aids for enhanced safety and control
- Stylish and functional design with a TFT multifunction display and LED headlamp
- Race-ready features including the PANKL Racing System and "Ready to Race" mantra
Cons -- - High purchase price might deter budget-conscious buyers
- Seat height may not be comfortable for shorter riders
- Limited fuel tank capacity compared to some competitors
- Heavier weight might not appeal to beginners or less experienced riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4188