Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi E100

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 220F and Apache RTR 200 Fi E100

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 220F
Bajaj Pulsar 220F

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi E100
TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi E100

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 220.00 cc 197.75 cc
Engine 4-stroke, DTS-i, oil cooled, single cylinder SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Cooling System -- Oil Cooled
Maximum Power 21.05 Ps @ 8500 rpm 20.7 hp @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 19.12 Nm @ 7000 rpm 18.1 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed Gear Box
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 129 kmph
Battery -- 12V, 9Ah / 8Ah
Frame -- Double Cradle Split SynchroStiff Frame
Headlamp -- AHO 12V, 60/55 W H4 bulb with LED position lamp
Mileage
Overall Mileage 40 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 17 - Tubeless 90/90–17 49P Tubeless
Rear 120/80 - 17 - Tubeless 130/70–17 M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front 260 mm Disc 270 mm Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc 240 mm Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic, with anti-friction bush Telescopic Forks
Rear 5 way adjustable, Nitrox shock absorber Mono Tube - Mono Shock
Colors Available
Colors Ebony Black, Pearl Metallic White, Sapphire Blue, Cocktail Wine Red White


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2050 mm
Width 750 mm 790 mm
Height 1165 mm 1105 mm
Weight 150 kg 152 kg
Wheelbase 1350 mm 1353 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The iconic Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTS-Fi has been upgraded to Pulsar 220F with, Bharat Stage-IV compl Read More The TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi E100 is a popular and highly acclaimed motorcycle in its segment. Pow Read More
Features -- - Fully Digital Interactive Speedometer
- Aggressive Tank Cowl
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful and robust engine performance
- Exceptional braking system
- Comfortable ride quality
- Agile handling
- Digital interactive speedometer
Cons -- - Available only in white
- Fuel tank capacity could have been larger

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8153