Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180F Neon and Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon
Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 197.75 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, DTS-i SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric and Kick Start
Clutch -- A-RT (Anti Reverse Torque) Slipper Clutch
Fuel System -- Keihin CV Carburettor
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid-Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.22 Nm @ 6500 RPM 18.1 ± 0.5 Nm @ 7000 ± 300 r
Transmission -- 5 Speed Gear Box
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 129 kmph
Battery -- 12V, 9Ah
Frame -- Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Headlamp H7 (12V 55W) 60/55W, H4 Bulb with All-Day On LED Position Lamp
Taillamp LED LED 2.5 W
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 17 - Tubeless 90/90-17" Tubeless
Rear 120/80 - 17 - Tubeless 130/70-17" Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 260 mm disc Disc (270 mm Petal type)
Rear 230 mm disc Disc (240 mm Petal type)
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic Forks
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorber Mono Tube - Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors -- Black, Grey, Red, White and Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2050 mm
Width 765 mm 790 mm
Height 1115 mm 1105 mm
Weight 151 kg 149 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1353 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- Check the newer variant
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful performance with a top speed of 129 kmph
- Excellent handling and stability with a Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF frame
- Unique A-RT Slipper Clutch technology for better gear downshifting
- Attractive design available in multiple color options
Cons -- - Price may be slightly high for budget-conscious buyers
- Fuel tank capacity could have been larger for long rides

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6310