Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180F Neon and Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon
Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 199.50 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, DTS-i 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSVI Compliant FI DTS-i Engine
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.22 Nm @ 6500 RPM 18.5 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Battery -- 12V Full DC MF
Headlamp H7 (12V 55W) H4 Blue Tinge (12V 55/60W), With AHO (Auto Headlamps On)
Taillamp LED --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 17 - Tubeless 100/80-17 52 P Tubeless
Rear 120/80 - 17 - Tubeless 130/70-17 62 P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 260 mm disc Single Channel ABS, 300 mm Disc (ABS)
280 mm Disc (Double Disc)
Rear 230 mm disc 230 mm Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorber Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Colors Available
Colors -- Wild Red
Fiery Yellow
Mirage White
Graphite Black


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2017 mm
Width 765 mm 804 mm
Height 1115 mm 1075 mm
Weight 151 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 156
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1363 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 168 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- The Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6 is an impressive bike that comes equipped with a 199.50 cc 4 Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Aggressive and muscular design catches the eye.
- Strong engine performance with decent fuel efficiency.
- Comfortable ride quality, even on rough terrains.
- Effective braking system with Single Channel ABS for enhanced safety.
- Tubeless tyres provide excellent grip and reduce the risk of sudden deflation.
- Liquid cooling system ensures the engine runs optimally even under strain.
Cons -- - The 12-litre fuel tank could be larger for long-distance travel.
- Lack of dual-channel ABS can affect handling under emergency braking.
- Seat comfort could be improved for better long-ride comfort.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5553