Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180F Neon and Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon
Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 160.30 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, DTS-i 4 Stroke, SOHC 4 Valve, Oil Cooled, Twin Spark BSVI DTS-i FI engine
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Cooling System Air Cooled Oil Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.22 Nm @ 6500 RPM 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Top Speed -- 120 kmph
Battery -- 12V Full DC MF
Headlamp H7 (12V 55W) H4 (12V 55/60W)
Taillamp LED --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl 40 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 17 - Tubeless 100/80-17 tyre
Rear 120/80 - 17 - Tubeless 130/70-17 tyre
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 260 mm disc 300 mm Disc
Rear 230 mm disc 230 mm Disc
ABS -- Dual Channel ABS Braking
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorber Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Colors Available
Colors -- Pearl Metallic White (2023)
Ebony Black (2023)
Saffire Blue
Wild Red
Fossil Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2017 mm
Width 765 mm 803.5 mm
Height 1115 mm 1060 mm
Weight 151 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 151
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1372 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 177 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- The 2023 update of the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 is a great improvement on an already impressive moto Read More
Features -- Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Fuel Tank

Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Upside Down Front Fork
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Robust and responsive 160.3 cc engine offers impressive power and torque.
- Upside-down front fork and Nitrox mono shock absorber ensure a smooth and comfortable ride.
- Dual-channel ABS system provides enhanced safety during braking.
- Offers impressive fuel efficiency with 40 km per litre.
- Variety of colour options cater to different aesthetic preferences.
Cons -- - Top speed of 120 kmph may not satisfy speed enthusiasts.
- Limited ground clearance might affect performance on rough terrains.
- A 12-litre fuel tank might require frequent refills on longer rides.
- The ex-showroom price may be slightly higher compared to competitors in the same segment.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2799