Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon BS6 vs Suzuki Gixxer 150

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180F Neon BS6 and Gixxer 150

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon BS6

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting -- Electric and Kick Start
Fuel System Fuel Injection Carburetor
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 rpm 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 Nm @ 6500 rpm 14Nm@6000 rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed -- 118 kmph
Battery 12V Full DC MF 12V
Frame -- Diamond Type
Headlamp H7 (12V 55W) – 2no. 12V 35/35W
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 63 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 100/80-17-Tubeless
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 140/60R-17-Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Cast
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Single Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorber Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Black Red
Neon Orange
Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2050 mm
Width 750 mm 785 mm
Height 1165 mm 1030 mm
Weight -- 135 kg
Kerb Weight 156 --
Wheelbase 1350 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon BS6 is a stylish and powerful motorcycle designed for Indian roads. Read More Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Energetic performance from the 178.60 cc BS6-compliant engine.
- Eye-catching aesthetics in two vibrant colour variants.
- Excellent braking performance with disc brakes on both wheels.
- Comfortable seating and ride quality due to effective suspension setup.
- Good value for money proposition in the segment.
- Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
Cons - Lack of modern features like a digital instrument console or Bluetooth connectivity.
- The air-cooled engine may struggle during longer rides in hot weather.
- Absence of a dual-channel ABS could be a downside for safety-conscious buyers.
- Limited colour options might deter potential customers looking for more variety.
- Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8226