Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs Yamaha TW200

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and TW200

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha TW200
Yamaha TW200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 196.00 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine SOHC four-stroke; two valves
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Air Cooled Air-Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM --
Transmission -- Constant-mesh five-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 130/80-18
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 180/80-14
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake 220 mm Single disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake 110 mm Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic fork with 6.3 inch travel
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Single shock with 5.9 inch travel
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
--


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm --
Width 765 mm --
Height 1165 mm --
Weight 151 kg 126 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1326 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 7 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More --
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
--
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5197