Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs TVS Apache GP 165R

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and Apache GP 165R

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache GP 165R
TVS Apache GP 165R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 165.00 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine 4 stroke, Liquid cooled, Single cylinder, SOHC
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric
Clutch -- Multiple disc in oil bath with hydraulic Control
Fuel System -- Carburettor
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid cooled with forced circulation
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM --
Transmission -- 5 Speed
Top Speed -- 160 kmph
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Frame -- Double cradle, steel
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 90x80 x17
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 110x70x17
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake Front disc 270 mm with hydraulic Control
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake 130 mm Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush --
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe 110mm travel Mono suspension
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
--


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm --
Width 765 mm --
Height 1165 mm --
Weight 151 kg 95 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 10 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More --
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
--
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3455