Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF Moto GP

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and Gixxer SF Moto GP

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF Moto GP
Suzuki Gixxer SF Moto GP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 155.00 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 14.1 ps @8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 14.0 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed, MT
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery 12V Full DC MF Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 100/80R - 17 M/C - Tubeless
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 140/60R - 17 M/C - Radial Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic, Coil spring, Oil damped
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Swing Arm Type, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
--


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2025 mm
Width 765 mm 715 mm
Height 1165 mm 1035 mm
Weight 151 kg 146 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1340 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More The Suzuki Gixxer SF Moto GP is a popular choice among motorcycle enthusiasts. Its 155.00 cc 4- Read More
Features -- - ABS
- Aerodynamic Design
- Digital Instrumentation
- Twin Muffler
- Clip-On Handle Bar
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
- Aerodynamic and stylish design
- Efficient fuel injection system
- Robust performance
- Comfortable riding experience
- Advanced ABS for safe braking
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
- Less powerful than some competitors
- Limited color options
- Lack of a sixth gear could be a letdown for some riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7176