Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs Suzuki Gixxer 150

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and Gixxer 150

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric and Kick Start
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 14Nm@6000 rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed -- 118 kmph
Battery 12V Full DC MF 12V
Frame -- Diamond Type
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) 12V 35/35W
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 63 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 100/80-17-Tubeless
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 140/60R-17-Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Cast
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake Single Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2050 mm
Width 765 mm 785 mm
Height 1165 mm 1030 mm
Weight 151 kg 135 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
- Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
- Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

748