Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs Keeway RKS 200

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and RKS 200

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

Keeway RKS 200
Keeway RKS 200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 197.00 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric & Kick
Clutch -- Wet multi-plate
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition -- C.D.I
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 9.3KW @ 7500 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 13.50Nm @ 6500 rpm
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Frame -- Bassinet type
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 90/90-17
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 110/80-17
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake Single disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic forks
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Telescopic coil spring oil damped
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
Red, Black


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2040 mm
Width 765 mm --
Height 1165 mm 1070 mm
Weight 151 kg 117 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1260 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 16.00 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More --
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
--
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1516