Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 199.50 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSVI Compliant FI DTS-i Engine
Engine Starting Electric and Kick --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 18.5 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Battery 12V Full DC MF 12V Full DC MF
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) H4 Blue Tinge (12V 55/60W), With AHO (Auto Headlamps On)
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 100/80-17 52 P Tubeless
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 130/70-17 62 P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake Single Channel ABS, 300 mm Disc (ABS)
280 mm Disc (Double Disc)
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake 230 mm Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
Wild Red
Fiery Yellow
Mirage White
Graphite Black


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2017 mm
Width 765 mm 804 mm
Height 1165 mm 1075 mm
Weight 151 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 156
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1363 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 168 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More The Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6 is an impressive bike that comes equipped with a 199.50 cc 4 Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
- Aggressive and muscular design catches the eye.
- Strong engine performance with decent fuel efficiency.
- Comfortable ride quality, even on rough terrains.
- Effective braking system with Single Channel ABS for enhanced safety.
- Tubeless tyres provide excellent grip and reduce the risk of sudden deflation.
- Liquid cooling system ensures the engine runs optimally even under strain.
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
- The 12-litre fuel tank could be larger for long-distance travel.
- Lack of dual-channel ABS can affect handling under emergency braking.
- Seat comfort could be improved for better long-ride comfort.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5260