Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer 150

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 150 and Gixxer 150

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 150
Bajaj Pulsar 150

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 149.50 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i FI Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric and Kick Start
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Cooling System -- Air Cooled
Maximum Power 14 PS @ 8500 RPM 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 13.25 NM @ 6500 RPM 14Nm@6000 rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed -- 118 kmph
Battery 12V Full DC 12V
Frame -- Diamond Type
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) 12V 35/35W
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 63 kmpl
Tyres
Front 80/100 17 Tubeless 100/80-17-Tubeless
Rear 100 / 90 17 Tubeless 140/60R-17-Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Cast
Brakes
Front ABS, 260 mm Disc Single Disc
Rear 130mm Dia. Drum Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic, 31mm Conventional fork Telescopic
Rear Twin Shock absorber, Gas filled with Canister Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Black/Grey
Black /Red
Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2050 mm
Width 765 mm 785 mm
Height -- 1030 mm
Weight 148 kg 135 kg
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 150 is a popular motorcycle that has been on the market for many years. With i Read More Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Robust and reliable 149.50 cc, BSVI-compliant DTS-i FI engine.
- Sporty and stylish aesthetics.
- Respectable fuel economy with a 15-litre tank capacity.
- Excellent suspension system for a comfortable ride on varied terrains.
- ABS 260mm disc front brake for reliable and safe stopping power.
- Reasonably priced for the features it offers.
- Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
Cons - Rear drum brake instead of disc could be a potential downside for some riders.
- Lack of a digital instrument cluster which is becoming standard in this segment.
- Despite the robust engine, top-end performance could be better.
- Limited colour options.
- Absence of a sixth gear may affect long highway rides.
- Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6871