Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat vs UM Max ZR

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 125 Split Seat and Max ZR

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat

Brand:

Model:

UM Max ZR
UM Max ZR

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.40 cc 124.04 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine --
Engine Starting Electric or Kick Start Electric / Kick
Fuel System Fuel injection --
Ignition Twin Spark CDI
Cooling System -- Air
Maximum Power 11.8 PS @ 8500 RPM 10.72 HP @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 10.8 NM @ 6500 RPM 8.60 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Transmission 5-speed 5 speed with clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Seats Split Seat Ensure Maximum Comfort --
Headlamp 35 W Low/High Beam --
Tyres
Front 80/100 x 17 Tubeless --
Rear 100/90 x 17 Tubeless --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc/130 mm Drum --
Rear 130 mm Drum --
Suspension
Front Telescopic with anti-friction bushes Telescopic hydraulic forks
Rear Twin Gas Shock, Nitrox Rear shock absorber Hydraulic monoshock with spring
Colors Available
Colors Black Red
Black Silver
Red, Black, Blue, Orange, Green


Physical Specs
Length 2042 mm 1900 mm
Width 765 mm 735 mm
Height 1060 mm 970 mm
Weight -- 100 kg
Kerb Weight 142 --
Seat Height 790 --
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1250 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres --
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat is a stylish and comfortable motorcycle with a powerful engine Read More --
Features - Sporty Design
- First-in-class Split Seat
- First-in-class Split Grab Rails
- Nitrox Rear shock absorber
- Anti-Skid Braking Technology
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Sporty and sleek design with first-in-class features such as Split Seat and Split Grab Rails.
- Smooth and responsive 124.4 cc Twin Spark DTS-i Engine with a balanced power output.
- Excellent handling with Telescopic front and Nitrox rear suspension.
- Anti-skid braking technology ensures secure stopping power.
- Good fuel efficiency and comfortable ride quality.
- Attractive pricing for the features offered.
--
Cons - Lack of a disc brake option at the rear for improved braking performance.
- Limited color options might not appeal to all consumers.
- The bike might feel underpowered for some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of LED lighting might disappoint modern tech enthusiasts.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2960