Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 vs UM Max ZR

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 and Max ZR

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Brand:

Model:

UM Max ZR
UM Max ZR

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.40 cc 124.04 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine --
Engine Starting -- Electric / Kick
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System -- Air
Maximum Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 10.72 HP @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 11 Nm @ 6500 rpm 8.60 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Transmission -- 5 speed with clutch
Top Speed 112 kmph --
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Headlamp HS1 (12V 35/35W) --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 80/100 x 17 Tubeless --
Rear 100/90 x 17 Tubeless --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc / 170 mm Drum --
Rear 130 mm Drum --
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic hydraulic forks
Rear Twin Gas Shock Hydraulic monoshock with spring
Colors Available
Colors Platinum Silver
Solar Red
Neon Blue
Red, Black, Blue, Orange, Green


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 1900 mm
Width 755 mm 735 mm
Height 1060 mm 970 mm
Weight -- 100 kg
Kerb Weight 140 --
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1250 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres --
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 is a budget-friendly motorcycle that is designed for city riding. Read More --
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Powerful and eco-friendly BS6 compliant engine.
- Reliable braking system offering efficient stopping power.
- Lightweight alloy wheels with tubeless tyres for better grip and stability.
- Durable and comfortable chassis and suspension for a smooth ride.
- Sufficient fuel tank capacity of 15 litres for extended rides.
- Affordable price point for the features offered.
--
Cons - The drum brake at the rear could be upgraded to a disc brake for improved braking.
- Power might seem less to some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster could be a drawback for tech-savvy riders.
- The design could be a bit dated for those seeking a modern aesthetic.
- Lacks some of the advanced features present in competitors at a similar price point.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8976