Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 vs TVS Victor

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 and Victor

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Brand:

Model:

TVS Victor
TVS Victor

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.40 cc 109.70 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine Single cylinder, four-stroke
Engine Starting -- Kick Start
Clutch -- Wet, multi plate type
Fuel System -- Carburettor, CV type
Maximum Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 7.06 KW @ 7500 rpm
Maximum Torque 11 Nm @ 6500 rpm 9.4 NM @ 6000 rpm
Transmission -- 4 Speed, constant mesh
Top Speed 112 kmph --
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Headlamp HS1 (12V 35/35W) --
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions -- 76 kmpl
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 80/100 x 17 Tubeless 2.75 X 17
Rear 100/90 x 17 Tubeless 3.00 X 17
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc / 170 mm Drum Drum- Hand Operated Internally Expanding, 130 mm ; Disc- Hand Operated, 240mm Disc
Rear 130 mm Drum Foot Operated, Internally Expanding, 110 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic Oil Damped Front Suspension
Rear Twin Gas Shock 5 Step Adjustable Hydraulic Series Spring Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Platinum Silver
Solar Red
Neon Blue
Blue, Red, Silver, Grey, Black Red, Black Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 1980 mm
Width 755 mm 750 mm
Height 1060 mm 1090 mm
Weight -- 112 kg
Kerb Weight 140 --
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1260 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 175 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 8 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 is a budget-friendly motorcycle that is designed for city riding. Read More TVS launched the 110cc motorcycle the Victor GL in 2001. Victor GL was the first the first bike Read More
Features -- Tubeless tyres with superior grip
Powerful 3V Ecothrust Engine with 76 kmpl mileage
Comfortable series spring suspension
The Most Spacious seat in the segment
Roto-Petal Disc Brake
Pros and Cons
Pros - Powerful and eco-friendly BS6 compliant engine.
- Reliable braking system offering efficient stopping power.
- Lightweight alloy wheels with tubeless tyres for better grip and stability.
- Durable and comfortable chassis and suspension for a smooth ride.
- Sufficient fuel tank capacity of 15 litres for extended rides.
- Affordable price point for the features offered.
--
Cons - The drum brake at the rear could be upgraded to a disc brake for improved braking.
- Power might seem less to some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster could be a drawback for tech-savvy riders.
- The design could be a bit dated for those seeking a modern aesthetic.
- Lacks some of the advanced features present in competitors at a similar price point.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9593