Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 vs Keeway TXM 125 S

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 and TXM 125 S

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Brand:

Model:

Keeway TXM 125 S
Keeway TXM 125 S

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.40 cc 125.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke, 2-valve
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Pressure splash lubrication
Clutch -- Wet multi-plate
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition -- TLI
Cooling System -- Air-cooled
Maximum Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 8.2kW/9000 r/min
Maximum Torque 11 Nm @ 6500 rpm 9.4N.m/7500 r/min
Top Speed 112 kmph 90 kmph
Battery 12V Full DC MF 12V 6Ah (YTX7L-BS)
Frame -- Bassinet type
Headlamp HS1 (12V 35/35W) --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 80/100 x 17 Tubeless 100/80-17
Rear 100/90 x 17 Tubeless 130/80-17
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc / 170 mm Drum Disc
Rear 130 mm Drum Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic forks
Rear Twin Gas Shock Swing arm
Colors Available
Colors Platinum Silver
Solar Red
Neon Blue
Black


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2090 mm
Width 755 mm 830 mm
Height 1060 mm 1140 mm
Weight -- 135 kg
Kerb Weight 140 --
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1340 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 225 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 10.5 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 is a budget-friendly motorcycle that is designed for city riding. Read More --
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Powerful and eco-friendly BS6 compliant engine.
- Reliable braking system offering efficient stopping power.
- Lightweight alloy wheels with tubeless tyres for better grip and stability.
- Durable and comfortable chassis and suspension for a smooth ride.
- Sufficient fuel tank capacity of 15 litres for extended rides.
- Affordable price point for the features offered.
--
Cons - The drum brake at the rear could be upgraded to a disc brake for improved braking.
- Power might seem less to some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster could be a drawback for tech-savvy riders.
- The design could be a bit dated for those seeking a modern aesthetic.
- Lacks some of the advanced features present in competitors at a similar price point.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7649