Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 vs Kawasaki KLX 110

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 and KLX 110

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki KLX 110
Kawasaki KLX 110

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.40 cc 112.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, SOHC, Air-cooled
Ignition -- DC-CDI
Maximum Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm --
Maximum Torque 11 Nm @ 6500 rpm --
Transmission -- 4-speed
Top Speed 112 kmph --
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Frame -- Backbone frame, high-tensile steel
Headlamp HS1 (12V 35/35W) --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 80/100 x 17 Tubeless 2.50 x 14
Rear 100/90 x 17 Tubeless 3.00 x 12
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc / 170 mm Drum Mechanical Drum
Rear 130 mm Drum Mechanical Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic 30mm hydraulic telescopic fork
Rear Twin Gas Shock Swingarm w/single hydraulic shock
Colors Available
Colors Platinum Silver
Solar Red
Neon Blue
Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 1560 mm
Width 755 mm 650 mm
Height 1060 mm 955 mm
Weight -- 75.9 kg
Kerb Weight 140 --
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1074.42 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 215.9 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 3.79 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 is a budget-friendly motorcycle that is designed for city riding. Read More --
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Powerful and eco-friendly BS6 compliant engine.
- Reliable braking system offering efficient stopping power.
- Lightweight alloy wheels with tubeless tyres for better grip and stability.
- Durable and comfortable chassis and suspension for a smooth ride.
- Sufficient fuel tank capacity of 15 litres for extended rides.
- Affordable price point for the features offered.
--
Cons - The drum brake at the rear could be upgraded to a disc brake for improved braking.
- Power might seem less to some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster could be a drawback for tech-savvy riders.
- The design could be a bit dated for those seeking a modern aesthetic.
- Lacks some of the advanced features present in competitors at a similar price point.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8695