Bajaj Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6 vs Bajaj Pulsar 150 Neon

Compare Specifications of Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6 and Pulsar 150 Neon

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6
Bajaj Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar 150 Neon
Bajaj Pulsar 150 Neon

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 102.00 cc --
Engine 4-Stroke, DTS-i, Single Cylinder 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark, Air Cooled, BSIV Compliant DTS-i Engine
Engine Starting Kick + Electric Starter Electric
Fuel System Electronic Injection --
Cooling System -- Air Cooled
Maximum Power 7.9 PS @ 7500 rpm 14 PS @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 8.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm 13.4 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Transmission 4 Speed (All Down Shift) --
Top Speed 90 kmph --
Battery DC system 12 V Full DC
Frame Tubular single down tube with lower cradle frame --
Saddle Saddle height : 804 mm --
Headlamp 12V, 35/35W, HS1 (Blue Ting) 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps
Tyres
Front 2.75 X 17, 41 P - Tube Type 80/100 - 17
Rear 3.00 X 17, 50 P - Tube Type 100 / 90 - 17
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc 240 mm Disc
Rear 110 mm Drum with Anti-Skid Braking System 130 mm Drum
Suspension
Front 135 mm, Hydraulic, Telescopic Type Telescopic, with anti-friction bush
Rear 110 mm, Spring on Spring (SoS) with Nitrox Gas Canister 5 way adjustable, Nitrox shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors Red
Black
Neon Red, Neon Silver


Physical Specs
Length 2006 mm 2055 mm
Width 713 mm 755 mm
Height 1100 mm 1060 mm
Weight -- 144 kg
Kerb Weight 117.5 --
Seat Height 807 --
Wheelbase 1255 mm 1320 mm
Ground Clearance 200 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 15 L litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6 is a reliable and efficient commuter bike. The 102.00 cc Read More --
Features Nitrox Suspension
Long Front and Rear Suspension
Long and Soft Seat
Wide Rubber Footpads
Tank Pads
LED DRL
--
Additional Details Kerb weight : 119 kg (Platina 100 ES Disc)
Kerb weight : 117.5 kg (Platina 100 ES Drum)
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Excellent fuel efficiency, making it a cost-effective commuter.
- Comfort-oriented design features such as a long, soft seat and wide rubber footpads.
- Good ground clearance, suitable for uneven road conditions.
- Reliable engine performance for daily commuting.
- Anti-skid braking system for enhanced safety.
- Competitive pricing offering great value for features and performance.
--
Cons - Limited power might not be suitable for high-speed highway rides.
- 4-speed transmission might limit the smoothness of long rides.
- The simplistic design may not appeal to riders looking for a sportier look.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster, which is becoming standard in the segment.
- The absence of a rear disc brake might impact braking efficiency under certain conditions.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3671