Bajaj CT110 KS BS6 vs Bajaj Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6

Compare Specifications of CT110 KS BS6 and Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6

Selected Bikes

Bajaj CT110 KS BS6
Bajaj CT110 KS BS6

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6
Bajaj Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 115.45 cc 102.00 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder 4-Stroke, DTS-i, Single Cylinder
Engine Starting Kick start Kick + Electric Starter
Fuel System Electronic Injection Electronic Injection
Maximum Power 8.6 PS @ 7000 rpm 7.9 PS @ 7500 rpm
Maximum Torque 9.81 Nm @ 5000 rpm 8.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Transmission 4 Speed (All Down Shift) 4 Speed (All Down Shift)
Top Speed -- 90 kmph
Battery -- DC system
Frame Tubular single down tube with lower cradle frame Tubular single down tube with lower cradle frame
Saddle Saddle height : 812 mm Saddle height : 804 mm
Headlamp 12V, 35/35W, HS1
LED Daytime Running Lights (DRL)
12V, 35/35W, HS1 (Blue Ting)
Tyres
Front 2.75 X 17, 41 P - Tube Type, Semi-knobby 2.75 X 17, 41 P - Tube Type
Rear 3.00 X 17, 50 P - Tube Type, Semi-knobby 3.00 X 17, 50 P - Tube Type
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 130 mm Drum 240 mm Disc
Rear 110 mm Drum with CBS 110 mm Drum with Anti-Skid Braking System
Suspension
Front Hydraulic telescopic, 125 mm Travel 135 mm, Hydraulic, Telescopic Type
Rear 100 mm wheel travel, SNS suspension 110 mm, Spring on Spring (SoS) with Nitrox Gas Canister
Colors Available
Colors Gloss Flame Red with Bright Red Decals
Matte Olive Green with Yellow Decals
Gloss Ebony Black with Blue Decals
Red
Black


Physical Specs
Length 1945 mm 2006 mm
Width 752 mm 713 mm
Height 1072 mm 1100 mm
Weight 117 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 117.5
Seat Height -- 807
Wheelbase 1235 mm 1255 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10.5 litres 11 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj CT110 KS BS6 is a sturdy motorcycle with a well-designed frame that provides good sta Read More The Bajaj Platina ComforTec 100 ES BS6 is a reliable and efficient commuter bike. The 102.00 cc Read More
Features Kadak Semi-knobby Tyres Nitrox Suspension
Long Front and Rear Suspension
Long and Soft Seat
Wide Rubber Footpads
Tank Pads
LED DRL
Additional Details -- Kerb weight : 119 kg (Platina 100 ES Disc)
Kerb weight : 117.5 kg (Platina 100 ES Drum)
Pros and Cons
Pros - Economically priced making it an affordable option for many buyers.
- Fuel-efficient 115.45 cc engine, reducing running costs.
- Solid build quality ensuring durability and longevity.
- Comfortable riding experience thanks to effective suspension setup.
- Compact dimensions and lightweight for easy manoeuvrability in traffic.
- Semi-knobby tyres providing good road grip.
- Available in attractive colour options enhancing the aesthetic appeal.
- Excellent fuel efficiency, making it a cost-effective commuter.
- Comfort-oriented design features such as a long, soft seat and wide rubber footpads.
- Good ground clearance, suitable for uneven road conditions.
- Reliable engine performance for daily commuting.
- Anti-skid braking system for enhanced safety.
- Competitive pricing offering great value for features and performance.
Cons - Lacks a disc brake option which could have improved stopping power.
- Kick start feature may be inconvenient for some, as compared to an electric start.
- Engine performance might not be suitable for high-speed highway use.
- The all downshift 4-speed gearbox might take some getting used to.
- Absence of modern features such as a digital instrument console.
- The seat could be more comfortable for long journeys.
- Limited tank capacity might require frequent refuelling on longer rides.
- Limited power might not be suitable for high-speed highway rides.
- 4-speed transmission might limit the smoothness of long rides.
- The simplistic design may not appeal to riders looking for a sportier look.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster, which is becoming standard in the segment.
- The absence of a rear disc brake might impact braking efficiency under certain conditions.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6768