Aprilia RSV4 R-FW vs Yamaha XV950R

Compare Specifications of RSV4 R-FW and XV950R

Selected Bikes

Aprilia RSV4 R-FW
Aprilia RSV4 R-FW

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XV950R
Yamaha XV950R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999.60 cc 942.00 cc
Engine Aprilia longitudinal 65° V-4 cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid cooling system, double overhead camshafts (DOHC), four valves per cylinder air-cooled, 4-valves, 4-stroke, SOHC, V-type 2-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Push Start Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump lubrication system with oil radiator and two oil pumps (lubrication and cooling) Wet sump
Clutch Multi-disc oil-bath, with mechanical slipper system Wet, Multiple Disc
Fuel System Airbox with front dynamic air intakes. 4 Marelli 48-mm throttle bodies with 8 injectors and latest generation Ride-By-Wire engine management. Fuel Injection
Ignition Magneti Marelli digital electronic ignition system integrated in engine control system, with one spark plug per cylinder and “stick-coil”-type coils TCI
Cooling System Liquid Cooled air cooled
Maximum Power 230 54.3 PS @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque 115 Nm @ 10500 rpm 79.5 Nm @ 3000 rpm
Transmission 6-Speed Cassette type gearbox Constant Mesh, 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Frame Aluminium dual beam chassis with pressed and cast sheet elements. double cradle
Tyres
Front -- 100/90-19M/C 57H (Tubeless)
Rear -- 150/80B16M/C 71H (Tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Forged Aluminium Alloys spoke cast wheels
Brakes
Front -- 298 mm Hydraulic single disc
Rear -- 298 mm Hydraulic single disc
Suspension
Front -- 41 mm Telescopic forks
Rear -- Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2290 mm
Width -- 830 mm
Height -- 1120 mm
Weight -- 252 kg
Wheelbase -- 1570 mm
Ground Clearance -- 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18.5 litres 13 litres
Overview
About This is a Track Oriented bike developed by Aprilia Racing Team to create the new "Factory Works Read More --
Features -- --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name:

Comment:

6684 Enter the numbers here: