Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5 vs Yamaha Super Tenere 1200 DX

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5 vs Yamaha Super Tenere 1200 DX

Compare Specifications of RSV4 Factory E5 and Super Tenere 1200 DX

Selected Bikes

Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5 Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Yamaha Super Tenere 1200 DX Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	1099.00 cc	1199.00 cc
Engine	Aprilia 4 longitudinal 65° V4 cylinder, 4-strokes, liquid cooling system, double overhead camshaft (DOHC), four valves per cylinder	DOHC, 4 stroke, 8 valve, Liquid cooling
Engine Starting	Electric	Electrical
Engine Lubrication	--	Dry sump
Clutch	Multi plate wet clutch with mechanical slipper system	Multi-disc / Wet
Fuel System	Airbox with front dynamic air intakes. 4 Marelli 48-mm throttle bodies with 8 injectors and Ride-By-Wire engine management	Electronic injection
Ignition	--	TCI
Cooling System	Liquid Cooled	Liquid Cooling
Maximum Power	217 PS @ 13000 RPM	110.4 hp @ 7250 rpm
Maximum Torque	125 NM @ 10500 RPM	116.6 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Transmission	6-speed cassette type gearbox Gear lever with Aprilia Quick Shift electronic system (AQS)	6 Speeds
Gear Shift Pattern	--	1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain	Primary Drive : Straight cut gears and integrated flexible coupling, drive ratio: 73/44 (1,659) Secondary Drive: Chain: Drive ratio: 41/16 (2,562)	--
Display	Digital Display	--
Frame	Aluminium dual beam chassis with pressed and cast sheet elements Available adjustments: headstock position and angle, engine height, swingarm pin height Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed Öhlins steering damper	Backbone
Headlamp	LED	--
Taillamp	LED	--

Tyres

Front	Radial tubeless. front: 120/70 ZR 17 (alternative: 190/50 ZR 17)	110 / 80R19 M / C 59V METZELER
Rear	Radial tubeless. rear: 200/55 ZR 17 (alternative: 190/55 ZR 17)	150 / 70R17 M / C 69V METZELER
Wheel / RIM	Forged aluminium alloy wheels, completely machined, with 5 split spoke design. Front: 3.5”x17” Rear: 6”x17”	Spoke

Brakes

Front	Dual 330-mm diameter floating stainless steel disc with lightweight stainless steel rotor and aluminium flange with 6 pins. brembo stylema® monobloc radial callipers with 4  30 mm opposing pistons. sintered pads. radial pump and metal braided brake hose	310 mm Hydraulic double disc with anti-locking system
Rear	220 mm diameter disc; Brembo calliper with two  32 mm separate pistons. Sintered pads. Pump with integrated tank and metal braided hose Bosch ABS with cornering function and 3 map settings, equipped with RLM (Rear wheel Lift-up Mitigation) strategy	82 mm Hydraulic disc with anti-locking system (ABS)

Suspension

Front	Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed Öhlins NIX fork.  43 mm stanchions, with TIN surface treatment Aluminium radial calliper mounts, adjustable in hydraulic compression and rebound damping and spring pre-load, 125 mm travel	190.2 mm Telescopic Fork Inverted
Rear	Upside-down double braced aluminium swingarm; Öhlins TTX monoshock with Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed piggyback, fully adjustable in: spring pre-load, wheelbase and hydraulic compression and rebound damping. 115 mm travel	89 mm Monocross back balance with link

Colors Available

Colors

Lava Red Aprilia Black

Heritage Blue (Metallic Blue) / Matt Black (Black Metallic Frosted)

Physical Specs

Length	2055 mm	2255 mm
Width	735 mm	980 mm
Height	--	1470 mm
Weight	--	265 kg
Kerb Weight	202	--
Seat Height	845	--
Wheelbase	1435 mm	--
Ground Clearance	--	190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	17.9 litres	22.6 litres

Overview

Features	- APRC system (Aprilia Performance Ride Control) that includes engine maps (AEM) - Engine brake control (AEB) - Traction control (ATC) - Wheelie control(AWC) - Launch control (ALC) - Cruise control (ACC) - Speed limiter (APT)	--
Additional Details	Headstock angle: 24.6° Trail: 104.5 mm Omologation : Euro 5 Consumption: 6.90 litres/100 km Emissions CO2: 160 g/km	--

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

3593