Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5 vs Triumph Bonneville Scrambler 1200

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5 vs Triumph Bonneville Scrambler 1200

Compare Specifications of RSV4 Factory E5 and Bonneville Scrambler 1200

Selected Bikes

Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5 Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Triumph Bonneville Scrambler 1200 Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	1099.00 cc	1200.00 cc
Engine	Aprilia 4 longitudinal 65° V4 cylinder, 4-strokes, liquid cooling system, double overhead camshaft (DOHC), four valves per cylinder	Liquid-cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel-twin
Engine Starting	Electric	--
Clutch	Multi plate wet clutch with mechanical slipper system	Wet, multi-plate assist clutch
Fuel System	Airbox with front dynamic air intakes. 4 Marelli 48-mm throttle bodies with 8 injectors and Ride-By-Wire engine management	Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System	Liquid Cooled	Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power	217 PS @ 13000 RPM	89 bhp @7400 rpm
Maximum Torque	125 NM @ 10500 RPM	110 Nm @ 3950 rpm
Transmission	6-speed cassette type gearbox Gear lever with Aprilia Quick Shift electronic system (AQS)	6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern	--	1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain	Primary Drive : Straight cut gears and integrated flexible coupling, drive ratio: 73/44 (1,659) Secondary Drive: Chain: Drive ratio: 41/16 (2,562)	--
Display	Digital Display	--
Frame	Aluminium dual beam chassis with pressed and cast sheet elements Available adjustments: headstock position and angle, engine height, swingarm pin height Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed Öhlins steering damper	Tubular steel with aluminium cradle
Headlamp	LED	--
Taillamp	LED	--

Tyres

Front	Radial tubeless. front: 120/70 ZR 17 (alternative: 190/50 ZR 17)	90/90-21
Rear	Radial tubeless. rear: 200/55 ZR 17 (alternative: 190/55 ZR 17)	150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM	Forged aluminium alloy wheels, completely machined, with 5 split spoke design. Front: 3.5”x17” Rear: 6”x17”	Spoke

Brakes

Front	Dual 330-mm diameter floating stainless steel disc with lightweight stainless steel rotor and aluminium flange with 6 pins. brembo stylema® monobloc radial callipers with 4  30 mm opposing pistons. sintered pads. radial pump and metal braided brake hose	Twin 320 mm Brembo discs, Brembo M50 4-piston radial monobloc calipers, ABS
Rear	220 mm diameter disc; Brembo calliper with two  32 mm separate pistons. Sintered pads. Pump with integrated tank and metal braided hose Bosch ABS with cornering function and 3 map settings, equipped with RLM (Rear wheel Lift-up Mitigation) strategy	Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper, ABS

Suspension

Front	Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed Öhlins NIX fork.  43 mm stanchions, with TIN surface treatment Aluminium radial calliper mounts, adjustable in hydraulic compression and rebound damping and spring pre-load, 125 mm travel	Showa 45 mm fully adjustable upside down forks, 200 mm travel
Rear	Upside-down double braced aluminium swingarm; Öhlins TTX monoshock with Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed piggyback, fully adjustable in: spring pre-load, wheelbase and hydraulic compression and rebound damping. 115 mm travel	Fully adjustable Ohlins twin shocks with piggy back reservoir, 200 mm rear wheel travel

Colors Available

Colors

Lava Red Aprilia Black

--

Physical Specs

Length	2055 mm	--
Width	735 mm	840 mm
Height	--	1200 mm
Weight	--	205 kg
Kerb Weight	202	--
Seat Height	845	--
Wheelbase	1435 mm	1530 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	17.9 litres	16 litres

Overview

Features	- APRC system (Aprilia Performance Ride Control) that includes engine maps (AEM) - Engine brake control (AEB) - Traction control (ATC) - Wheelie control(AWC) - Launch control (ALC) - Cruise control (ACC) - Speed limiter (APT)	- Bluetooth Connectivity Module - Rider-Focused Technology
Additional Details	Headstock angle: 24.6° Trail: 104.5 mm Omologation : Euro 5 Consumption: 6.90 litres/100 km Emissions CO2: 160 g/km	--

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

5013