Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5 vs Suzuki GSX S1000F

Compare Specifications of RSV4 Factory E5 and Suzuki GSX S1000F

Selected Bikes

Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5
Aprilia RSV4 Factory E5

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki GSX S1000F
Suzuki GSX S1000F

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1099.00 cc 999.00 cc
Engine Aprilia 4 longitudinal 65° V4 cylinder, 4-strokes, liquid cooling system, double overhead camshaft (DOHC), four valves per cylinder 4-stroke, 4-cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Multi plate wet clutch with mechanical slipper system Wet Multiplate
Fuel System Airbox with front dynamic air intakes. 4 Marelli 48-mm throttle bodies with 8 injectors and Ride-By-Wire engine management Fuel injection
Ignition -- Electronic ignition (transistorized)
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 217 PS @ 13000 RPM 145 bhp @ 10,000 rpm
Maximum Torque 125 NM @ 10500 RPM 106 Nm @ 9,500 rpm
Transmission 6-speed cassette type gearbox
Gear lever with Aprilia Quick Shift electronic system (AQS)
6-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Primary Drive : Straight cut gears and integrated flexible coupling, drive ratio: 73/44 (1,659)
Secondary Drive: Chain: Drive ratio: 41/16 (2,562)
--
Top Speed -- 240 kmph
Display Digital Display --
Frame Aluminium dual beam chassis with pressed and cast sheet elements Available adjustments: headstock position and angle, engine height, swingarm pin height
Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed Öhlins steering damper
Lightweight Aluminium
Headlamp LED Halogen Bulb Type
Taillamp LED LED Tail Lamp
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 14 kmpl
Tyres
Front Radial tubeless.
front: 120/70 ZR 17 (alternative: 190/50 ZR 17)
120/70ZR17M/C (58W), tubeless
Rear Radial tubeless.
rear: 200/55 ZR 17 (alternative: 190/55 ZR 17)
190/50ZR17M/C (73W), tubeless
Wheel / RIM Forged aluminium alloy wheels, completely machined, with 5 split spoke design.
Front: 3.5”x17”
Rear: 6”x17”
17-inch Alloy Wheels
Brakes
Front Dual 330-mm diameter floating stainless steel disc with lightweight stainless steel rotor and aluminium flange with 6 pins. brembo stylema® monobloc radial callipers with 4  30 mm opposing pistons. sintered pads. radial pump and metal braided brake hose Disc, twin
Rear 220 mm diameter disc; Brembo calliper with two  32 mm separate pistons. Sintered pads. Pump with integrated tank and metal braided hose Bosch ABS with cornering function and 3 map settings, equipped with RLM (Rear wheel Lift-up Mitigation) strategy Disc
Suspension
Front Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed Öhlins NIX fork.  43 mm stanchions, with TIN surface treatment Aluminium radial calliper mounts, adjustable in hydraulic compression and rebound damping and spring pre-load, 125 mm travel Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear Upside-down double braced aluminium swingarm; Öhlins TTX monoshock with Smart EC 2.0 electronically managed piggyback, fully adjustable in: spring pre-load, wheelbase and hydraulic compression and rebound damping. 115 mm travel Link type, coil spring, oil damped
Colors Available
Colors Lava Red
Aprilia Black
Metallic Triton Blue, Glass Sparkle Black / Candy Daring Red, Metallic Mat Fibroin Gray


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2115 mm
Width 735 mm 795 mm
Height -- 1080 mm
Kerb Weight 202 --
Seat Height 845 --
Wheelbase 1435 mm N/A mm
Ground Clearance -- 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17.9 litres 17 litres
Overview
About -- Suzuki GSX S1000F is available in India from May 2015. Under the slim fairing skin of this beas Read More
Features - APRC system (Aprilia Performance Ride Control) that includes engine maps (AEM)
- Engine brake control (AEB)
- Traction control (ATC)
- Wheelie control(AWC)
- Launch control (ALC)
- Cruise control (ACC)
- Speed limiter (APT)
Engine control module (ECM).
Three-mode traction control system.
Antilock braking system (ABS)
Additional Details Headstock angle: 24.6°
Trail: 104.5 mm
Omologation : Euro 5
Consumption: 6.90 litres/100 km
Emissions CO2: 160 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9427