Aprilia RSV4 E5 vs Triumph Bonneville Bobber 2021

Compare Specifications of RSV4 E5 and Bonneville Bobber 2021

Selected Bikes

Aprilia RSV4 E5
Aprilia RSV4 E5

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Bonneville Bobber 2021
Triumph Bonneville Bobber 2021

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1099.00 cc 1200.00 cc
Engine Aprilia 4 longitudinal 65° V4 cylinder, 4-strokes, liquid cooling system, double overhead camshaft (DOHC), four valves per cylinder Liquid cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel twin
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch Multi plate wet clutch with mechanical slipper system Wet, multi-plate torque assist clutch
Fuel System Airbox with front dynamic air intakes. 4 Marelli 48-mm throttle bodies with 8 injectors and Ride-By-Wire engine management Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Maximum Power 217 PS @ 13000 RPM 78 PS / 76.9 bhp (57.5 kW) @ 6100 RPM
Maximum Torque 125 NM @ 10500 RPM 106 Nm @ 4000 RPM
Transmission 6-speed cassette type gearbox
Gear lever with Aprilia Quick Shift electronic system (AQS)
6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Primary Drive : Straight cut gears and integrated flexible coupling, drive ratio: 73/44 (1,659)
Secondary Drive: Chain: Drive ratio: 41/16 (2,562)
Final Drive: Chain
Top Speed -- 185 kmph
Riding Modes . 6
Riding modes (3 Road, 3 Track)
--
Display -- Analogue speedometer with LCD multi-functional display
Frame S Sachs steering damper Tubular steel, twin cradle frame
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 21 kmpl
Tyres
Front Radial tubeless.
front: 120/70 ZR 17 (alternative: 190/50 ZR 17)
MT 90 B16
Rear Radial tubeless.
rear: 200/55 ZR 17 (alternative: 190/55 ZR 17)
150/80 R16
Wheel / RIM Aprilia in aluminium alloy wheels with 3 split spoke design
Front: 3.5”x17”
Rear: 6”x17
Front Wheel: Wire 32-spoke, 16 x 2.5 inches
Rear Wheel: Wire 32-spoke, 16 x 3.5 inches
Brakes
Front Dual 330-mm diameter floating stainless steel disc with lightweight stainless steel rotor and aluminium flange with 6 pins. Brembo Stylema® monobloc radial callipers with 4 30 mm opposing pistons. Sintered pads. Radial pump and metal braided brake hose Twin Ø310mm disc, Brembo 2-piston sliding axial calipers, ABS
Rear 220 mm diameter disc; Brembo calliper with two  32 mm separate pistons. Sintered pads. Pump with integrated tank and metal braided hose Bosch ABS with cornering function and 3 Single Ø255mm disc, Nissin single piston sliding axial caliper, ABS
Suspension
Front Sachs fork 43 stanchions, adjustable compression and rebound, travel 127 mm 47 mm Showa cartridge forks
Rear Sachs monoshock adjustable in: hydraulic compression and rebound damping and spring pre-load, 130 mm travel Mono-shock RSU with linkage
Colors Available
Colors DARK LOSAIL MATT STORM GREY MATT IRONSTONE
CORDOVAN RED
JET BLACK


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm --
Width 735 mm --
Weight -- 251 kg
Kerb Weight 202 --
Handlebar Width -- 800
Seat Height 845 700
Wheelbase 1435 mm 1500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 12 litres
Overview
About -- The price for Cordovan Red is ₹ 12,18,000.00 and the price for Matt Storm Grey Matt Ironstone Read More
Features - APRC system (Aprilia Performance Ride Control) that includes engine maps (AEM)
- Engine brake control (AEB)
- Traction control (ATC)
- Wheelie control(AWC)
- Launch control (ALC)
- Cruise control (ACC)
- Speed limiter (APT)
- UPDATED HIGH TORQUE ENGINE
- DISTINCTIVE SOUNDTRACK
- DISTINCTIVE FLOATING SEAT
- NEW BLACKED OUT STYLE
- HIGHER SPEC BRAKES
Additional Details Headstock angle: 24.6°
Trail: 104.5 mm
Omologation : Euro 5
Consumption: 6.90 litres/100 km
Emissions CO2: 160 g/km
Exhaust : Brushed stainless steel 2 into 2 twin-skin exhaust system with brushed stainless silencers
Swingarm: Twin sided fabrication
Height Without Mirror: 1024 - 1055 mm
Rake: 25.4 º
Trail : 92.0 mm
Fuel Consumption : 60.9 mpg (4.6 l/100km)
CO2 Figures: 105 g/km EURO 5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption data are measured according to regulation 168/2013/EC. Figures for fuel consumption are derived from specific test conditions and are for comparative purposes only. They may not reflect real driving results.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4025