Aprilia RS4 125 Replica vs Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Compare Specifications of RS4 125 Replica and Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Selected Bikes

Aprilia RS4 125 Replica
Aprilia RS4 125 Replica

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.80 cc 124.40 cc
Engine Four stroke liquid cooled single cylinder with electronic injection and 4 valves 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine
Engine Starting Electric start --
Maximum Power -- 12 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 11 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Transmission 6 speed --
Top Speed -- 112 kmph
Battery -- 12V Full DC MF
Headlamp -- HS1 (12V 35/35W)
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 50 kmpl
Tyres
Front 110/70 - 17 i nch 80/100 x 17 Tubeless
Rear 150/60 - 17 inch 100/90 x 17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front 300 mm stainless steel disc with radial 4 piston calliper, daisy design. 240 mm Disc / 170 mm Drum
Rear 218 mm stainless steel disc and calliper with single 30 mm piston, daisy design. 130 mm Drum
Suspension
Front 41 mm upside down fork Telescopic
Rear Asymmetric swingarm with monoshock Twin Gas Shock
Colors Available
Colors Replica sbk. Platinum Silver
Solar Red
Neon Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1953 mm 2055 mm
Width 740 mm 755 mm
Height 1138 mm 1060 mm
Kerb Weight -- 140
Wheelbase 1350 mm 1320 mm
Ground Clearance -- 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.5 litres 15 litres
Overview
About Aprilia RS4 125 Replica is the refined version of RS4 125. Read More The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 is a budget-friendly motorcycle that is designed for city riding. Read More
Features Aprilia RS4 125 Replica is powerful 125 cc single cylinder engine. --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful and eco-friendly BS6 compliant engine.
- Reliable braking system offering efficient stopping power.
- Lightweight alloy wheels with tubeless tyres for better grip and stability.
- Durable and comfortable chassis and suspension for a smooth ride.
- Sufficient fuel tank capacity of 15 litres for extended rides.
- Affordable price point for the features offered.
Cons -- - The drum brake at the rear could be upgraded to a disc brake for improved braking.
- Power might seem less to some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster could be a drawback for tech-savvy riders.
- The design could be a bit dated for those seeking a modern aesthetic.
- Lacks some of the advanced features present in competitors at a similar price point.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2851