Aftek Skipper AF-125 vs Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat

Compare Specifications of Skipper AF-125 and Pulsar 125 Split Seat

Selected Bikes

Aftek Skipper AF-125
Aftek Skipper AF-125

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.40 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, Single cylinder air cooled engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine
Engine Starting -- Electric or Kick Start
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Ignition -- Twin Spark
Maximum Power 8.5 kw @ 9000 RPM 11.8 PS @ 8500 RPM
Maximum Torque 10.5 NM @ 6500 RPM 10.8 NM @ 6500 RPM
Transmission -- 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 85 kmph --
Battery -- 12V Full DC MF
Seats -- Split Seat Ensure Maximum Comfort
Headlamp -- 35 W Low/High Beam
Tyres
Front 2.75*18 80/100 x 17 Tubeless
Rear 3.00*18 100/90 x 17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disk brake 240 mm Disc/130 mm Drum
Rear 130mm mechanical shoe brake 130 mm Drum
Suspension
Front Hydraulic, telescopic forks Telescopic with anti-friction bushes
Rear Hydraulic dampers with helical spring Twin Gas Shock, Nitrox Rear shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors -- Black Red
Black Silver


Physical Specs
Length -- 2042 mm
Width -- 765 mm
Height -- 1060 mm
Weight 105 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 142
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1270 mm 1320 mm
Ground Clearance -- 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 11.5 litres
Overview
About -- The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat is a stylish and comfortable motorcycle with a powerful engine Read More
Features -- - Sporty Design
- First-in-class Split Seat
- First-in-class Split Grab Rails
- Nitrox Rear shock absorber
- Anti-Skid Braking Technology
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Sporty and sleek design with first-in-class features such as Split Seat and Split Grab Rails.
- Smooth and responsive 124.4 cc Twin Spark DTS-i Engine with a balanced power output.
- Excellent handling with Telescopic front and Nitrox rear suspension.
- Anti-skid braking technology ensures secure stopping power.
- Good fuel efficiency and comfortable ride quality.
- Attractive pricing for the features offered.
Cons -- - Lack of a disc brake option at the rear for improved braking performance.
- Limited color options might not appeal to all consumers.
- The bike might feel underpowered for some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of LED lighting might disappoint modern tech enthusiasts.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8563