Aftek Scorpion Z-200 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0

Compare Specifications of Scorpion Z-200 and Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0

Selected Bikes

Aftek Scorpion Z-200
Aftek Scorpion Z-200

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 200.00 cc 197.75 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, Single cylinder air cooled engine with Counter Balancer SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric and Kick Start
Clutch -- A-RT (Anti Reverse Torque) Slipper Clutch
Fuel System Fuel Injection Keihin CV Carburettor
Ignition Fuel-injected --
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid-Cooled
Maximum Power 14kW @8000 RPM 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 18Nm @6500 RPM 18.1 ± 0.5 Nm @ 7000 ± 300 r
Transmission -- 5 Speed Gear Box
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 129 kmph
Battery -- 12V, 9Ah
Frame -- Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Headlamp -- 60/55W, H4 Bulb with All-Day On LED Position Lamp
Taillamp LED taillights LED 2.5 W
Tyres
Front 90/90 R17 49S Tubeless Tyre 90/90-17" Tubeless
Rear 130/70 R17 62S Tubeless Tyre 130/70-17" Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc Disc (270 mm Petal type)
Rear Disc Disc (240 mm Petal type)
Suspension
Front Hydraulic, telescopic forks Telescopic Forks
Rear Hydraulic dampers with helical spring Mono Tube - Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors -- Black, Grey, Red, White and Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2050 mm
Width -- 790 mm
Height -- 1105 mm
Weight 125 kg 149 kg
Wheelbase 1296 mm 1353 mm
Ground Clearance -- 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- Check the newer variant
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful performance with a top speed of 129 kmph
- Excellent handling and stability with a Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF frame
- Unique A-RT Slipper Clutch technology for better gear downshifting
- Attractive design available in multiple color options
Cons -- - Price may be slightly high for budget-conscious buyers
- Fuel tank capacity could have been larger for long rides

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9613