Aftek Scorpion Z-200 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Compare Specifications of Scorpion Z-200 and Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Selected Bikes

Aftek Scorpion Z-200
Aftek Scorpion Z-200

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 200.00 cc 199.50 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, Single cylinder air cooled engine with Counter Balancer 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSVI Compliant FI DTS-i Engine
Fuel System Fuel Injection Fuel injection
Ignition Fuel-injected --
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 14kW @8000 RPM 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
Maximum Torque 18Nm @6500 RPM 18.5 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Battery -- 12V Full DC MF
Headlamp -- H4 Blue Tinge (12V 55/60W), With AHO (Auto Headlamps On)
Taillamp LED taillights --
Tyres
Front 90/90 R17 49S Tubeless Tyre 100/80-17 52 P Tubeless
Rear 130/70 R17 62S Tubeless Tyre 130/70-17 62 P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc Single Channel ABS, 300 mm Disc (ABS)
280 mm Disc (Double Disc)
Rear Disc 230 mm Disc
Suspension
Front Hydraulic, telescopic forks Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush
Rear Hydraulic dampers with helical spring Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Colors Available
Colors -- Wild Red
Fiery Yellow
Mirage White
Graphite Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2017 mm
Width -- 804 mm
Height -- 1075 mm
Weight 125 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 156
Wheelbase 1296 mm 1363 mm
Ground Clearance -- 168 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- The Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS6 is an impressive bike that comes equipped with a 199.50 cc 4 Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Aggressive and muscular design catches the eye.
- Strong engine performance with decent fuel efficiency.
- Comfortable ride quality, even on rough terrains.
- Effective braking system with Single Channel ABS for enhanced safety.
- Tubeless tyres provide excellent grip and reduce the risk of sudden deflation.
- Liquid cooling system ensures the engine runs optimally even under strain.
Cons -- - The 12-litre fuel tank could be larger for long-distance travel.
- Lack of dual-channel ABS can affect handling under emergency braking.
- Seat comfort could be improved for better long-ride comfort.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5248