Aftek Royal Plus 110 vs KTM RC 125

Compare Specifications of Royal Plus 110 and RC 125

Selected Bikes

Aftek Royal Plus 110
Aftek Royal Plus 110

Brand:

Model:

KTM RC 125
KTM RC 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 110.00 cc 124.70 cc
Engine Single cylinder, four-stroke Single Cylinder 4 Valve, DOHC, Liquid Cooled, Fuel injection
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps
Clutch -- Wet, Multiplate
Ignition -- Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid cooling system
Maximum Power 6.5 kw @ 8500 RPM 14.5 PS @ 9250 rpm
Maximum Torque 9.0 NM @ 6500 RPM 12 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Transmission -- 6 speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery -- 12 V 8 AH VRLA
Frame -- Trellis Frame
Tyres
Front 2.75*17 110/70 R17 Rear
Rear 3.00*17 150/60 R17
Wheel / RIM alloy wheels Alloy
Brakes
Front Drum brake 300 mm Disc
Rear Drum brake 230 mm Disc
Suspension
Front Hydraulic, telescopic forks 43 mm Inverted telescopic fork
Rear Hydraulic dampers with helical spring Mono shox.- 10 steps (Adjuster Slots)
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 1977 mm
Weight 100 kg 154.2 kg
Wheelbase 1290 mm 1341 mm
Ground Clearance -- 157 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 9.5 litres
Overview
About -- The KTM RC 125 is a sleek and stylish sports bike that is sure to turn heads on the road. With Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - High-performance engine in the 125cc segment with liquid cooling and fuel injection
- Sporty, aggressive design and styling that stands out
- Reliable braking system with disc brakes at both ends
- Good handling and maneuverability due to the lightweight Trellis frame
- Advanced features like a digital ignition system and a VRLA battery
Cons -- - High price for a 125cc motorcycle, which might not suit all budgets
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 9.5 liters may require frequent refueling on longer rides
- May be underpowered for experienced riders looking for more speed and torque
- Ground clearance of 157mm, while decent, may pose issues on extremely rough terrains
- Lack of certain advanced features like dual-channel ABS, which are available in some competitors

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7226