Aftek Knight Rider KR-170 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Compare Specifications of Knight Rider KR-170 and Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Selected Bikes

Aftek Knight Rider KR-170
Aftek Knight Rider KR-170

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 170.00 cc 160.30 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, Single cylinder air cooled engine with Counter Balancer 4 Stroke, SOHC 4 Valve, Oil Cooled, Twin Spark BSVI DTS-i FI engine
Engine Starting Electric Start --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Cooling System Air Cooled Oil Cooled
Maximum Power 12.5 kw @ 9000 RPM 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm
Maximum Torque 15.5NM @ 7500 RPM 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Top Speed -- 120 kmph
Battery -- 12V Full DC MF
Headlamp -- H4 (12V 55/60W)
Taillamp LED tail lamp --
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 40 kmpl
Tyres
Front 80/90 X17 100/80-17 tyre
Rear 110/80 X 17 130/70-17 tyre
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disk brake 300 mm Disc
Rear 130mm mechanical shoe brake 230 mm Disc
ABS -- Dual Channel ABS Braking
Suspension
Front Hydraulic, telescopic forks Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush
Rear Hydraulic dampers with helical spring Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Colors Available
Colors -- Pearl Metallic White (2023)
Ebony Black (2023)
Saffire Blue
Wild Red
Fossil Grey


Physical Specs
Length -- 2017 mm
Width -- 803.5 mm
Height -- 1060 mm
Weight 125 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 151
Wheelbase 1370 mm 1372 mm
Ground Clearance -- 177 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- The 2023 update of the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 is a great improvement on an already impressive moto Read More
Features -- Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Fuel Tank

Bajaj Pulsar Ns 160 Bs6
Upside Down Front Fork
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Robust and responsive 160.3 cc engine offers impressive power and torque.
- Upside-down front fork and Nitrox mono shock absorber ensure a smooth and comfortable ride.
- Dual-channel ABS system provides enhanced safety during braking.
- Offers impressive fuel efficiency with 40 km per litre.
- Variety of colour options cater to different aesthetic preferences.
Cons -- - Top speed of 120 kmph may not satisfy speed enthusiasts.
- Limited ground clearance might affect performance on rough terrains.
- A 12-litre fuel tank might require frequent refills on longer rides.
- The ex-showroom price may be slightly higher compared to competitors in the same segment.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6533