Suzuki Gixxer SF vs Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Compare Specifications of Gixxer SF and Gixxer SF SP

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer SF
Suzuki Gixxer SF

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF SP
Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 155.00 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4 -Stroke,1-Cylinder, Air cooled 4-Stroke. 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric & Kick
Fuel System Carburetor Carburetor
Maximum Power 14.8PS at 8000 rpm 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14 Nm at 6000 rpm 14Nm@6000rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, Manual Transmission --
Battery Maintenance free 12C, 3Ah Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Headlamp 12V 35/35W 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 100/80-17-Tubeless 100/80-17 - Tubeless
Rear 140/60R-17-Tubeless 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Cast --
Brakes
Front Single Disc Disc
Rear Drum Brake Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Triton Blue MotoGP Edition, Pearl Mirage White, Glass Sparkle Black Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2050 mm
Width 785 mm 785 mm
Height 1085 mm 1085 mm
Weight 139 kg 139 kg
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12 litres
Overview
About Rolling out from Suzuki India's stable is the new Suzuki Gixxer SF, featuring a fully-faired mo Read More Gixxer SF SP is the limited edition version of the Gixxer SF. This all new motorcycle is loaded Read More
Features Aerodynamic Sports Fairing.
Ultra light and robust engine.
Aluminium Muffler Cover.
Smart digital instrumentation with Gear Position and RPM indicator.
Stylish LED Taillamp.
7 step adjustable rear mono shock absorber.
Clear lens indicator.
Large diameter front forks.
Stylish SP Emblem & Sporty Graphics
Clear Lens LED Tail Lamp
Alluminium Muffler Cover
Smart Digital Instrumentation
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Excellent power and torque figures
- Comfortable for long rides
- Stylish design and attractive graphics
- Efficient fuel economy
- High-quality build and durability
Cons -- - Might be a bit pricey for some buyers
- Carburetor fuel system may require regular cleaning and maintenance
- Lack of a liquid-cooled engine could be a potential downside for some riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2389