Suzuki Gixxer 150 vs Yamaha FZ16

Compare Specifications of Gixxer 150 and FZ16

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha FZ16
Yamaha FZ16

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 153.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric Start/Kick Start
Clutch -- Wet, multiple-disc
Fuel System Carburetor --
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm 14PS / 7500 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000 rpm 13.6 N.m / 6000 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, MT 5 Speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1 Down -4 Up
Top Speed 118 kmph 112 kmph
Battery 12V 12 V, 5.0 Ah
Frame Diamond Type Diamond Type
Headlamp 12V 35/35W Multi-Reflector Type
Taillamp LED --
Mileage
Highway Mileage -- 45 kmpl
City Mileage -- 35 kmpl
Overall Mileage 63 kmpl 40 kmpl
Tyres
Front 100/80-17-Tubeless 100/80-17
Rear 140/60R-17-Tubeless 140/60-R17
Wheel / RIM Cast --
Brakes
Front Single Disc Disc
Rear Drum Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White Lava Red, Midnight Black.


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 1973 mm
Width 785 mm 770 mm
Height 1030 mm 1045 mm
Weight 135 kg 135 kg
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1334 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12 litres
Overview
About Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More --
Features -- Powerful 153cc Engine.
Monocross Suspension
Midship Muffler.
New Chain Protector.
Trendy LCD Meter Console.
Widest radical rear tyre.
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
--
Cons - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4730