Kawasaki Ninja 300R vs KTM Duke 390

Compare Specifications of Ninja 300R and Duke 390

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 300R
Kawasaki Ninja 300R

Brand:

Model:

KTM Duke 390
KTM Duke 390

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 296.00 cc 373.20 cc
Engine Four-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC, parallel twin Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, spark-ignition engine, liquid-cooled
Engine Starting Electric start Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump --
Fuel System Fuel Injection --
Ignition Digital Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump
Maximum Power 39 PS @ 11000 rpm 43.5 Ps @ 9000 Rpm
Maximum Torque 27.0 Nm @ 10000 rpm 35 Nm @ 7000 Rpm
Transmission 6 speed 6-speed, claw shifted
Gear Shift Pattern 1-down, 5-up 1-down, 5-up
Top Speed 177 kmph 160 kmph
Frame Tube diamond, steel Tubular space frame made from chrome molybdenum steel, powder-coated
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions -- 30 kmpl
Overall Mileage 26 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70R17 M/C 54H 110/70 x 17
Rear 140/60R17 M/C 66H 150/60 x 17
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front Single 290 mm petal disc Single balanced actuation dual-piston Disc brake with four-pot brake caliper
Rear Single 220 mm petal disc Caliper: Dual-piston Disc brake with one-pot brake caliper, floating brake discs
Suspension
Front 37 mm Telescopic Fork / 120 mm WP inverted fork 43 mm, 150 mm travel
Rear Bottom-Link Uni-Trak with gas-charged shock and 5-way adjustable preload WP monoshock, deb. 150 mm
Colors Available
Colors Candy Plasma Blue, Lime Green/Ebony Orange, white


Physical Specs
Length 2015 mm --
Width 715 mm --
Height 1110 mm 800 mm
Weight 179 kg 145 kg
Wheelbase 1405 mm 1367 mm
Ground Clearance 135 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres 11 litres
Overview
About Ninja is more known than the manufacturer brand, Kawasaki. Strange, but a fact! And adding more Read More The second big launch of the Austrian naked bike manufacturer. Massive is the machine. A step a Read More
Features Aggressive styling.
Dual throttle valves.
Wider 140mm rear tyre.
Smallest ABS unit.
Fine-atomising injectors
Lightweight supersport-style aluminium footpegs.
Uni-Trak rear suspension delivers a smooth ride and stable handling.
2-1 exhaust with short style silencer.
Fan cover located behind the radiator directs hot air down and away from the rider.
Lightweight new pistons with flatter crowns reduce reciprocating weight.
Multi-function LCD screen functions include speedometer, clock, fuel gauge, dual trip meters, odometer and ECO Economical Riding indicator.
Sleeveless aluminium die-cast cylinder features plated bores.
Large-diameter 290mm front petal disc brake and 220 mm rear petal brake.

2018 Updates
-Circuit-developed Diamond Frame
-Modern Instrumentation
-Heat Management Technology
-Race-derived Clutch Technology & Smoother Shift Feel
Equipped with Anti-Locking Brake System.
95% new components.
Easily manageable.
Low Fuel consumption.
Two overhead camshafts four valves actuated by DLC (Diamond Like Carbon) coated finger followers.
Dynamic cornering function.
Powerful engine.
Forged piston.
Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump.
Cutting Edge Fuel Injection technology by BOSCH.
Taller Gearing for hugh spped long rides.
Low Friction Nikasil Coated cylinder.
Steel Trellis Orange Frame
Orange Alloy Wheels
Pros and Cons
Pros 296cc liquid-cooled, parallel-twin engine.
Lightweight body
Digital Fuel Injection (DFI) system for better fuel economy and cleaner emissions
Aggressive body design
Stunning Dual headlamp
10-spoke 17-inch wheels
Revised six-speed transmission
ABS
Affordable pricing
Maneuverable
Cons No ABS version available in India
Overpriced
No traction control
Not for long rides
Looks like the Duke 200

User Comments
I think the Duke 390 is much better. There are at least 4 strong reasons for me to say this:- 1. good power at lower RPM. 2. Good torque at lower RPM. 3. Good ground clearance, which we need in India. 4. better milage.
By Shailesh Khule on 02-01-2014
Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

267