Husqvarna FS 450 vs Kawasaki Ninja 500

Compare Specifications of FS 450 and Ninja 500

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna FS 450
Husqvarna FS 450

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Ninja 500
Kawasaki Ninja 500

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 449.30 cc 451.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder 4-stroke engine, water-cooled Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin
Engine Starting Electric starter Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch Adler slipper clutch, hydraulically operated Assist & Slipper Clutch
Fuel System -- Fuel injection: ø32 mm x 2
Ignition Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment Digital
Cooling System Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump --
Maximum Power -- 45 PS @ 9,000 min-1
Maximum Torque -- 42.6 N·m @ 6,000 min-1
Transmission 5-speed, claw shifted 6-speed, return
Display -- LCD Instrument Panel
Frame Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing Trellis, high-tensile steel
Tyres
Front -- 110/70R17M/C 54H
Rear -- 150/60R17M/C 66H
Brakes
Front Disc brake with four-piston radially mounted brake caliper Semi-floating ø310 mm disc
Rear Disc brake with single-piston floating brake caliper 220 mm disc
Suspension
Front -- ø41 mm telescopic fork /120 mm
Rear -- Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload /130 mm
Colors Available
Colors White --


Physical Specs
Length -- 1,995 mm
Width -- 730 mm
Height -- 1,120 mm
Weight 110.5 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 171
Seat Height -- 785
Wheelbase 1495±10 mm 1,375 mm
Ground Clearance 310 mm 145 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.5 litres 14 litres
Overview
About -- The Kawasaki Ninja 500 packs a punch with its 451cc liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin engin Read More
Features -- - Relaxed, Sporty Riding Position
- Superb Ride Comfort and Wind Protection
- Light, Predictable Handling
Additional Details -- DOHC, 8 valves

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5913