Honda CB350RS vs Yamaha R3

Compare Specifications of CB350RS and R3

Selected Bikes

Honda CB350RS
Honda CB350RS

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R3
Yamaha R3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 348.36 cc 321.00 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, SI, BS-VI Engine 4-stroke, 2-cylinder, Liquid-cooled, DOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Self TCI
Clutch Multiplate Wet Clutch Wet, Multiple Disc
Fuel System PGM-FI Fuel Injection
Ignition -- Electric
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 20.7 hp @ 5500 rpm 42.0 Ps @ 10,750 rpm
Maximum Torque 30 Nm @ 3000 rpm 29.5 Nm @ 9,000 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Top Speed -- 181 kmph
Battery -- 12V, 7.0Ah
Display -- Fully Digital LCD Meter Console
Frame Half Duplex Cradle Diamond
Headlamp -- Bi-functional LED
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 29.3 kmpl
Tyres
Front 100/90-19M/C 57H 110/70 R17M/C 54H Tubeless
Rear 150/70-17M/C 69H 140/70 R17M/C 66H Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 310 mm Disc 298 mm Hydraulic Single Disc
Rear 240 mm Disc 220 mm Hydraulic Single Disc
ABS -- Dual Channel
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic Upside Down Fork (USD Fork)
Rear Twin-Hydraulic Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors Black With Pearl Sports Yellow
Radiant Red Metallic
--


Physical Specs
Length -- 2,090 mm
Width -- 730 mm
Height -- 1,140 mm
Kerb Weight -- 169
Seat Height -- 780
Wheelbase -- 1,380 mm
Ground Clearance -- 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 14 litres
Overview
About The Honda CB350RS is a stylish and powerful motorcycle that offers an impressive riding experie Read More The Yamaha R3, with its 321 cc engine, is a dynamic choice for riders seeking a bit more thrill Read More
Features -- Yamaha R3
Aggressive R1-inspired Face

Yamaha R3
Low Fuel Tank And Handlebar Position

Yamaha R3
37 mm upside down front forks

Yamaha R3
Fully Digital LCD Meter
Additional Details Dual Channel ABS --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Striking design with impeccable finishing
- Comfortable and ergonomic riding position
- Responsive and fuel-efficient engine
- Excellent build quality and durability
- Enhanced stability and maneuverability
--
Cons - Limited color options
- Rear tire width may not appeal to some riders
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6262