Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs Suzuki Gixxer 150

Compare Specifications of CB Unicorn 160 and Gixxer 150

Selected Bikes

Honda CB Unicorn 160
Honda CB Unicorn 160

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 162.71 cc 154.90 cc
Engine Four stroke air cooled, SI Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Kick and Electric Electric and Kick Start
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Cooling System -- Air Cooled
Maximum Power 10.82 kW (14.5 bhp) @ 8000 rpm 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.61 Nm @ 6000 rpm 14Nm@6000 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed 106 kmph 118 kmph
Battery 12V 4Ah 12V
Frame Diamond Diamond Type
Headlamp 12V 35/35 W 12V 35/35W
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 62 kmpl 63 kmpl
Tyres
Front 80/100-17 Tubeless 100/80-17-Tubeless
Rear 110/80-17 Tubeless 140/60R-17-Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Cast
Brakes
Front 240mm Disc Single Disc
Rear Drum 130mm (CBS) Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic
Rear Spring loaded hydraulic type. Monoshock Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Pearl Black, Imperial Red Metallic, Geny Gray Metallic, Sunbeam White Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White


Physical Specs
Length 2045 mm 2050 mm
Width 757 mm 785 mm
Height 1060 mm 1030 mm
Weight 135 kg 135 kg
Wheelbase 1324 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 150 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12 litres
Overview
About CB Unicorn 160 is the upgraded version of their Unicorn 150 launched in 2014. Unicorn was consi Read More Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More
Features Fully Digital Meter.
Aero dynamic front cowl with 3D emblem.
Impressive LED tail light.
New mid sized advanced engine.
Combined braking system.
Mono suspension.
--
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
Cons -- - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1485