Eider Dronzer vs Suzuki Gixxer 150

Compare Specifications of Dronzer and Gixxer 150

Selected Bikes

Eider Dronzer
Eider Dronzer

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 150.06 cc 154.90 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric / Kick Electric and Kick Start
Fuel System Carburetor Carburetor
Ignition C.D.I --
Cooling System Air Air Cooled
Maximum Power 11.5 Ps (8.5kw) @ 8000rpm 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 10.5 N.m @ 7500 rpm 14Nm@6000 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed 110 kmph 118 kmph
Battery 12V 5AH 12V
Frame Steel Diamond Type
Headlamp LED Digital 12V 35/35W
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions 60 kmpl --
Overall Mileage -- 63 kmpl
Tyres
Front 80/90 - 17 100/80-17-Tubeless
Rear 110/80 - 17 140/60R-17-Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Cast
Brakes
Front Disc Brake Single Disc
Rear Disc Brake Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic Upside down front Suspension Telescopic
Rear Mono Suspension Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Blue, Red, Yellow Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White


Physical Specs
Length 1980 mm 2050 mm
Width 700 mm 785 mm
Height 1080 mm 1030 mm
Weight -- 135 kg
Wheelbase 1340 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More
Features A newly introduced Telescopic Upside down suspension at front end with disc brakes.
Trendy looking LCD digital headlight.
A stylish digital and analog Speedometer with fuel capacity indicator.
A sleeky designed 15 liters fuel tank.
Optimized single cylinder 4-stroke engine with a 5-Speed Gearbox with an efficient mileage of 60 kmpl.
Mono suspension with disc brakes at the rare end.
--
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
Cons -- - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2802