Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Bajaj Pulsar AS 200

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 220F and Pulsar AS 200

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 220F
Bajaj Pulsar 220F

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar AS 200
Bajaj Pulsar AS 200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 220.00 cc 199.50 cc
Engine 4-stroke, DTS-i, oil cooled, single cylinder Triple Spark, Liquid Cooled, 4 Valve DTSi Engine
Engine Starting -- Electric and Kick Start
Clutch -- Wet Multi Disc (Hydraulic)
Fuel System -- Carburettor
Ignition -- Digital Twin Spark Ignition
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooling
Maximum Power 21.05 Ps @ 8500 rpm 23.5 PS @ 9500 RPM
Maximum Torque 19.12 Nm @ 7000 rpm 18.3 Nm @ 8000 RPM
Transmission -- 6-Speed Gearbox
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed -- 127 kmph
Battery -- 12V Full DC MF
Frame -- Pressed Steel Perimeter Frame
Headlamp -- 55 W Low beam projector. 55 W High beam.
Mileage
Overall Mileage 40 kmpl 42 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 17 - Tubeless 100/80-17
Rear 120/80 - 17 - Tubeless 130/70-17
Brakes
Front 260 mm Disc 280mm Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc 230mm Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic, with anti-friction bush Telescopic with anti friction bush
Rear 5 way adjustable, Nitrox shock absorber Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Colors Available
Colors Ebony Black, Pearl Metallic White, Sapphire Blue, Cocktail Wine Red Red, Blue and Black


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2070 mm
Width 750 mm 804 mm
Height 1165 mm 1205 mm
Weight 150 kg 153 kg
Wheelbase 1350 mm 1363 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 167 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The iconic Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTS-Fi has been upgraded to Pulsar 220F with, Bharat Stage-IV compl Read More Adventure Sports 200.

Pulsar AS200 is the new breed of motorcycle from Bajaj Aut Read More
Features -- Triple Spark Technology
Alpha Male Styling
Projector Headlamps
Front and Rear Disc Brakes
NITROX Mono-suspension
Pros and Cons
Pros -- -Value for money
-Performance
-Powerful machine
-Low vibration and engine noise
Cons -- -Construction yet to be refined
-Gearbox issue in long term
-Issue with chain and sproket

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1830