Bajaj Avenger Street 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer 150

Compare Specifications of Avenger Street 150 and Gixxer 150

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Avenger Street 150
Bajaj Avenger Street 150

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 150.00 cc 154.90 cc
Engine Twin spark, 2 valve, DTS-i engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric Starter Electric and Kick Start
Clutch Wet Multiplate --
Fuel System Carburettor Carburetor
Ignition Digital Twin Spark Ignition --
Cooling System Air cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 14.54 PS @ 9000 rpm 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 12.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm 14Nm@6000 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed Manual 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed 110 kmph 118 kmph
Battery 12V 4Ah VRLA 12V
Frame Tubular Double Cradle Type Diamond Type
Headlamp 55/60 W 12V 35/35W
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl 63 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 17 49P 100/80-17-Tubeless
Rear 130/90 - 15 66P 140/60R-17-Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Black alloys Cast
Brakes
Front Disc 240 mm Single Disc
Rear Drum 130 mm Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic with anti friction bush Telescopic
Rear Twin shock absorber Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Midnight Blue and Cosmic Red Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White


Physical Specs
Length 2177 mm 2050 mm
Width 801 mm 785 mm
Height 1070 mm 1030 mm
Weight 148 kg 135 kg
Wheelbase 1480 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 169 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Avenger 150 Street is based on the older Avenger series platform. It is the cheapest cruise Read More Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More
Features Iconic style and design
Street control handlebar
DTS-i Engine
Oil cooled
Alloy wheels
Long Wheel base
Low slung seating
Wide rear tyre
Digital meter
--
Pros and Cons
Pros -Economical in terms of pricetag
-Good and efficient engine
-Refined Gearbox
-Stylish graphics and paint job
-Comfortable riding position
- Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
Cons -Seats are stiffer
-Lack of tubeless tyres
-Reports of engine overheating
-Fuel Efficiency
- Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3063